Brief biography of Friedrich Nietzsche. Biography of Nietzsche Friedrich

The life and works of Nietzsche

With Nietzsche, philosophy again became a dangerous game, but in a different manner. In previous centuries, philosophy was a danger to the philosophers themselves, Nietzsche made it dangerous to everyone. Nietzsche went mad at the end of his life, and there is a certain madness in the tone of his later works. But dangerous ideas appeared in him long before insanity and have nothing to do with clinical symptoms. They anticipated a collective madness that had dire consequences in Europe in the first half of the 20th century. There are ominous signs of its relapse these days.

It might not be worth talking about the main philosophical ideas of Nietzsche - whether we are talking about a superman, eternal return (the idea that we live our lives over and over again for eternity) or the only goal of civilization (to produce "great people" like Goethe, Napoleon and Nietzsche himself). His use of the will to power as a universal explanation borders on oversimplification or nonsense - even Freud's monism looks subtler, and Schopenhauer's less specific concept is more convincing. Like any well-developed conspiracy theory, the Nietzschean doctrine of the all-pervading will to power contains the usual element of paranoia in such cases. But Nietzsche's way of philosophizing is no less brilliant, convincing and sharp than that of other philosophers before and after him. As you read it, you get the exhilarating feeling that philosophy actually makes sense (one of the reasons that makes it so dangerous). And when Nietzsche used the will to power solely as a tool of analysis, he discovered such constituent elements of human impulses, of which few had guessed. As a result, the philosopher debunked the values ​​that grew out of these motives, and traced the development of these values ​​on a broad historical canvas, illuminating the very foundations of our civilization and culture.

While Nietzsche is responsible for the dangerous nonsense that tarnished his name, it must be admitted that most of the accusations are caricatures of what he really wrote. He simply despised the proto-fascists of his time, anti-Semitism was disgusting to him, and the idea of ​​a racially pure German nation of masters would certainly have made him laugh Homeric. Had he lived (and retained his sane mind) until the 1930s, when he would have reached his ninth decade, he would hardly have been silent at the sight of the monstrous events that were happening in his homeland, like some German philosophers who considered themselves his followers.

Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche was born on October 15, 1844 in the state of Saxony-Anhalt, which at that time was a province of Prussia, which was rapidly gaining strength. Nietzsche came from a family of hereditary shopkeepers, including hatters and butchers, but his grandfather and father were already Lutheran pastors. Nietzsche's father was a patriot of Prussia, who highly valued his king, Frederick William IV. The first son of Karl Ludwig Nietzsche was born on the king's birthday, which determined the choice of the name. By some senseless coincidence, the king, his admirer and the son of the latter will die in a clouded mind.

The first was Karl Ludwig, who died in 1849. He was diagnosed with softening of the brain, and an autopsy showed that a fourth of his brain had indeed suffered from softening. Today's doctors do not make such diagnoses. Authoritative biographers of Nietzsche are convinced that his disease was not hereditary.

Nietzsche was brought up in Naumburg, among the "holy women": a mother, a maternal grandmother, a younger sister and two eccentric spinsters, his aunts. This seems to have influenced Nietzsche's attitude toward women in the future. At the age of thirteen, he began to study at the famous Pfort Gymnasium, one of the best closed schools in Germany. Such a pious upbringing and pampering greatly influenced Nietzsche (it was not for nothing that he was called "the little pastor") with all the ensuing consequences. But it was such a brilliant mind that in the end he inevitably began to think for himself. At eighteen, Nietzsche began to doubt his faith. The astute thinker saw square pegs in the round holes of the world around him. It is characteristic that these thoughts appeared in him when he was in complete isolation. Throughout his life, very few living people (and the dead too) influenced the philosopher's ideas.

At nineteen, Nietzsche entered the University of Bonn to study theology and classical philology, hoping to become a pastor. Frederick's future for years to come was planned by "holy women", but he already had an unconscious desire for rebellion, and his character changed. Once in Bonn, the lonely schoolboy suddenly turned into an outgoing student. He found a cheerful company, drank with friends and even fought a duel once (a common skirmish that ended as soon as he received an honorable wound - a small mark on his nose, which was later hidden by the arch of his glasses). It was only an inevitable stage in life. It was then that Nietzsche decided that "God is dead." (By the way, this phrase, which is always associated with Nietzsche and his philosophy, was first uttered by Hegel two decades before Nietzsche's birth.) Arriving home for the holidays, he refused the sacrament and announced that his feet would no longer be in church. The following year, he decided to move to Leipzig University, where he abandoned theology and focused on classical philology.

Nietzsche arrived in Leipzig in October 1865. In the same month he turned 21. Around the same time, two events occurred that were destined to change his life. During an excursion to Cologne, he visited a brothel. According to Nietzsche, the visit was accidental. Once in the city, he asked a street porter to take him to some restaurant, the same one brought him to a brothel. This is what Nietzsche later told a friend of his: “I immediately found myself surrounded by half a dozen visions in tinsel and transparent fabric, looking expectantly at me. For a brief moment, I was speechless. Then I instinctively turned to the only spiritualized object that was there: the piano. I played a few chords that relieved my paralysis and ran away. "

Of course, we have only Nietzsche's testimony about this dubious episode. Whether this visit to the brothel was accidental and whether Nietzsche caressed only the piano keys is impossible to say. He was almost certainly still a virgin at the time - an extremely ardent, but worldly inexperienced and awkward young man. (Which did not prevent him from speaking out on such topics. Despite his sexual status, he confidently told one friend that he needed three women to satisfy him.)

On reflection, Nietzsche must have decided that it was not only the piano that attracted him. He went back to the brothel, and when he returned to Leipzig, he almost certainly visited similar establishments several times. Soon after, Nietzsche discovered that he had contracted an illness. The doctor who treated him did not say that he had syphilis (in those days it was incurable, and such a diagnosis was not reported). Be that as it may, as a result of this incident, Nietzsche, apparently, began to abstain from sexual relations with women. However, all his life in his writings, he threw shocking, exposing the author himself remarks about them: “Are you going to women? Don't forget the whip! " (Though the Leipzig brothel may have been of the sort that Nietzsche thought it wise to go there to prepare for a fight.)

The second fateful incident occurred when he entered a second-hand bookseller's shop and found Schopenhauer's "The World as Will and Representation". “I picked up an unfamiliar book and began to turn over page by page. I don't know what kind of demon was whispering in my ears: "Take this book home." And so, violating my principle of never buying books at once, I did just that. Once at home, I huddled in the corner of the sofa with my new treasure and let this dynamic dark genius work on my mind ... I found myself looking in a mirror that reflected the world, life and my own nature in terrifying grandeur ... And then I saw the disease and health, exile and refuge, Hell and Paradise ”.

As a result of these strikingly prophetic sentiments, Nietzsche became a follower of Schopenhauer. At a time when Nietzsche had nothing to believe in, he simply needed Schopenhauer's pessimism and detachment. According to Schopenhauer, the world is just a performance supported by an all-pervading evil will. This will is blind and does not pay attention to the concerns of humanity and, when its representatives rebel against its manifestations around themselves (the world), imposes a life full of suffering on them. Our only opportunity is to reduce the power of the will within ourselves by choosing the path of rejection and asceticism.

Schopenhauer's pessimism did not correspond to the nature of Nietzsche, but he immediately recognized his honesty and strength. Henceforth, Nietzsche's positive ideas had to gain enough strength to go beyond this pessimism. The way forward ran through Schopenhauer. But the decisive factor was Schopenhauer's idea of ​​the will as a leading force. Ultimately, it transformed into a Nietzschean will to power.

In 1867 Nietzsche was drafted into the Prussian army for a year. The authorities were clearly fooled by the lush, fierce mustache that Nietzsche cultivated under the unconvincing duel scar, and appointed him to the cavalry. This was a mistake. Nietzsche was determined but physically pathetic. He was seriously injured when falling from a horse, but continued to ride in the best Prussian traditions. Returning to the barracks, Private Nietzsche was hospitalized for a month. For diligence, he received the rank of lance corporal and was sent home.

Nietzsche again found himself at the University of Leipzig, where he was recognized as the best student in forty years of teaching by his professor. But Nietzsche himself became disillusioned with philology and its "indifference to truth and the pressing problems of life." He didn't know what to do. In desperation, he considered switching to chemistry or going to Paris for a year to taste the "divine cancan or the yellow poison of absinthe." One fine day, he decided to introduce himself to the composer Richard Wagner, who secretly arrived in the city. (Twenty years earlier, Wagner had been banned from entering Saxony due to his revolutionary activities, and the ban remained in force, although since then the composer's political views have changed from left to right.)

Wagner was born the same year as Karl Ludwig Nietzsche and was remarkably similar to him. Nietzsche felt a desperate - albeit unconscious - need for a father. Previously, he did not meet with famous artists, nor with those whose ideas so answered his own. During their brief meeting, Nietzsche learned that Wagner deeply reveres Schopenhauer. Wagner, flattered by the attention of the brilliant young philosopher, revealed himself to him in all his splendor. He immediately made the deepest impression on Nietzsche. The great composer, in life as ardent as his operas, shocked Nietzsche.

A couple of months later, Nietzsche was offered a position as professor of philology at the University of Basel in Switzerland. He was only twenty-four years old, he hadn't even received his doctorate. For all his distrust of philology, Nietzsche could not refuse such a proposal. In April 1869 he took office at Basel and immediately began giving additional lectures on philosophy. He wanted to combine philosophy and philology, the study of aesthetics and classical authors, soldering them into a single tool that would reveal the blunders of our civilization - that's all! He quickly became a young rising star at the university and became friends with Jacob Burckhardt, the great cultural historian who was the first to develop the historical concept of the Renaissance. In the faculty, he was the only thinker on the same scale as Nietzsche, and perhaps the only person for whom the philosopher had awe all his life. Perhaps Burckhardt could have had a balancing influence on Nietzsche, but this was not allowed by his patrician restraint. In addition, the paternal influence in the life of Nietzsche already existed, and it can in no way be called balancing.

Basel is located a hundred kilometers from Triebschen, where Wagner lived with Liszt's daughter Cosima (at that time she was still married to a common friend of Liszt and Wagner, conductor von Bülow). Nietzsche immediately became a regular Sunday guest at Wagner's luxurious villa on the shores of Lake Lucerne. But the composer's life was like an opera, not only in a musical, emotional and social sense. This man believed that you can live entirely in accordance with your fantasies. Triebschen itself resembled an opera, and there was never any doubt about who had the main role here. Dressed in "Flemish" (a cross between a Dutchman and Rubens in a masquerade dress), in black silk breeches, a Scottish beret and an overgrown silk scarf, Wagner paced and recited among the walls covered with pink silk, rococo cherubs, his own busts, large paintings dedicated to him, and silver cups in memory of the performances of his operas. The air was filled with incense, and only the maestro's music was allowed to mix with them. And Cosima performed all the whims of her companion and made sure that no one took with them domestic lambs, wolfhounds in ribbons and decorative chickens roaming the garden.

It is difficult to understand how Nietzsche could have fallen for all this. Moreover, it is difficult to understand how anyone at all could have fallen for this. (Because of his extravagance, Wagner was constantly broke, so he needed the support of wealthy patrons, including King Ludwig of Bavaria, who generously helped him at the expense of the state treasury.) But when you listen to Wagner's music, you understand the power of conviction and the fatal charm of his character. The composer himself was as stunning as his enchanting melodies. The immature Nietzsche quickly succumbed to the spell of this heady atmosphere - the leitmotifs of unconscious fantasy permeated the luxurious salons. If Wagner replaced his father, then soon Nietzsche discovered in himself the Oedipus complex. Not daring to admit it (even to himself), he fell in love with Cosima.

In July 1870 the Franco-Prussian War broke out. Prussia had the opportunity to take revenge for the defeat in the Napoleonic Wars, to conquer France and turn Germany into the leading force in Europe. Filled with patriotic fervor, Nietzsche voluntarily entered the service of an orderly. As he drove through the small town on business, he saw ranks of cavalry rumbling through the streets in full dress. It was as if a veil had fallen from his eyes. "I clearly felt ... that the strongest and highest will to live finds its expression not in the pitiful struggle for existence, but in the will to battle, power and supremacy." This is how Will to Power was born, and although it has undergone major changes so that it should be viewed not in military terms, but rather in individual and social terms, it has never broken away from its militaristic source. Meanwhile, while Bismarck was crushing France, Nietzsche discovered that war is not only about glory. On the battlefield of Wörth, he worked in the midst of scattered human remains, fetid, decaying bodies. Then he had to transport the wounded and sick in a boxcar. On a two-day trip among shattered bones, gangrenous flesh and dying, Nietzsche behaved with dignity and courage. But, having arrived in Karlsruhe, he himself came down with dysentery and diphtheria and ended up in a hospital.

Despite this difficult experience, after two months Nietzsche again teaches in Basel. Having overloaded himself with lectures on philosophy and philology, he begins to write The Birth of Tragedy. This brilliant and highly original analysis of Greek culture contrasts the coherent and clear Apollonian principle of classical restraint with the dark instinctive Dionysian forces. According to Nietzsche, the great art of Greek tragedy arose from the fusion of these two principles, which was later destroyed by the empty rationalism of Socrates. The philosopher was the first to draw attention to the dark side of Greek culture as something fundamental, which met with a lot of objections. Throughout the 19th century. the classical world was something sacred. His ideals of justice, culture, and democracy were consistent with the rising middle classes' vision of themselves. No one wanted to hear that this was a mistake. Even more resistance was aroused by the fact that, in illustrating his arguments, Nietzsche often resorted to Wagner and his "music of the future." He even wrote to his publisher: "The real purpose [of this book] is to illuminate Richard Wagner, this exceptional mystery of our time, in his relation to the Greek tragedy." Only Wagner succeeded in combining both the Apollonian and Dionysian principles in the spirit of Greek tragedy.

The emphasis on the powerful Dionysian principle revealed an important aspect of the further philosophy of Nietzsche. He was no longer going to put up with Schopenhauer's "Buddhist denial of the will". Nietzsche contrasted Dionysianism with Christian influence, which, in his opinion, weakened civilization. He concluded that most of our motives are double-edged. Even our so-called best intentions have a dark side: “Every ideal presupposes love and hate, adoration and contempt. Premium mobile is a positive or negative feeling. " According to Nietzsche, Christianity began with a negative feeling. It took over the Roman Empire as the religion of the oppressed and slaves. This was fully manifested in the Christian attitude towards life. Christianity constantly strives to overcome our strongest positive instincts. This denial is both conscious (in accepting asceticism and self-restraint) and unconscious (in meekness, which Nietzsche considered an unconscious expression of resentment - aggression turned inside out in the weak).

Likewise, Nietzsche attacks the compassion, suppression of genuine feelings and the sublimation of desire, rooted in Christianity, invoking an ethic of power that matches the origins of our feelings. God is dead, the era of Christianity is over. XX century tried to prove Nietzsche was right, but it turned out that many of the best elements of "Christianity" are not related to faith in God. But whether we have become closer to our main feelings is a moot point.

Wagner was a great artist, but he was smaller as a philosopher. Gradually, Nietzsche discerned what was hidden under the intellectual mask of Wagner. Wagner was a walking ego of enormous size and intuitive power, but even his love for Schopenhauer was transitory, just grain for the mill of his art. Earlier, Nietzsche tried not to notice some of Wagner's disgusting everyday features: anti-Semitism, overflowing with arrogance and unwillingness to recognize the abilities and needs of anyone other than himself. But there is a limit to everything. Wagner moved to Bavaria, where King Ludwig built a theater for him, in which only Wagner's operas would be staged (this project devastated the Bavarian treasury and led to the abdication of Ludwig). In 1876, Nietzsche came to Bayreuth to attend the performance of the Ring of the Nibelungen, which opened the First Bayreuth Festival, but fell ill - the illness must have been of a psychosomatic nature. He could not bear megalomania and decadence and was forced to leave.

Two years later, Nietzsche published a book of aphorisms "Human, Too Human", which marked the final break with Wagner. The praise of French art, the psychological insight and abandonment of romantic pretensions, as well as the subtle sensitivity of Nietzsche in general, were completely unacceptable to Wagner. Worse, the book lacked the mandatory advertisements for the "music of the future."

But perhaps more importantly, the book alienated the most sincere admirers of his philosophy from Nietzsche. Ironically, the reason is precisely what makes Nietzsche admire today (even among those who deny his philosophy). Nietzsche began to develop his own style that allowed him to become a great master of the German language. (An extraordinary task, given the peculiarities of the German language, which the greatest writers of Germany could not cope with.) Nietzsche's style was always clear and warlike, and his ideas were condensed, but very intelligible. Now he began to write in aphorisms. Rejecting verbose argumentation, he preferred to express his ideas in the form of a series of piercing insights with quick transitions from topic to topic.

Nietzsche loved to walk and philosophized on the move. The best ideas came to him on long walks in the Swiss mountains and forests. He often reported that he wandered for more than three hours, despite his poor health (was this not just a projection of the will to power?). They even assure that Nietzsche's aphorism is connected with the fact that he wrote down his thoughts in a notebook on the go. Be that as it may, Nietzsche's aphoristic writing has no parallels in nineteenth-century Europe. Sounds loud, although Nietzsche would no doubt agree with it. The 19th century was the era of the great masters of style. However, with the exception of the French enfant terrible Rimbaud, no other writer sensed the coming revolution in language — tone and general meaning rather than accuracy. In Nietzsche's prose, you can hear the voice of the approaching XX century. Is the language of the future.

But all this did not happen overnight. When Nietzsche wrote Human, Too Human, the search for his own voice was just beginning. In many cases, his ideas themselves needed to find their expression. This work is filled with amazing psychological discoveries. "The dreamer denies reality to himself, the liar - only to others." "The mother of excessiveness is not joy, but joylessness." "All poets and writers who are in love with superlatives want to do more than they can." "Sharp? That is an epigram for the death of some feeling." However, there was a clear overkill. Nietzsche's admirers reproached him for not being a philosophy, and they were right. This is psychology (and of such a quality that after several decades Freud suddenly decided not to reread Nietzsche, fearing that after his books there was nothing more to say on these topics). But the mixture of aphorisms and psychology is not enough for a coherent lengthy book. Psychological revelations lacked a systemic reasoning that could tie the aphorisms together. Nietzsche's work was dubbed haphazard. But his ideas are no less coherent and reasoned than those that are contained in any great philosophical system.

Yes, of course, Nietzsche is haphazard in the sense that his philosophy heralded the end of all systems. Or she tried - there is always someone who wants to try (just at that time Karl Marx was working hard in the library of the British Museum).

Despite its flaws, the book "Human, Too Human" nominated Nietzsche among the most prominent psychologists of his time. This is a feat of sorts, given his unsociability. He was essentially a loner. In the generally accepted sense, he knew very few people. He had no real friends. In life, he had several close admirers, but his own obsession with Nietzsche did not allow him to bestow friendship on someone or accept the friendship of others. So how could he acquire such a deep knowledge of psychology? Many commentators believe that one person, Richard Wagner, was the source of Nietzsche's information in this area. Quite possible. Here you can really reveal a whole layer of psychological oddities. But such commentators usually overlook the fact that Nietzsche knew himself quite well (albeit with gaps and rather selectively).

Nietzsche's psychological insights are universal, although both of their sources are so different - the philosopher-misanthrope and the composer-madcap. Well, Nietzsche's access to his main psychological source will soon be closed. After the publication of Human, Too Human, a break with Wagner became inevitable. Nietzsche was preparing the arrival of the future "brave new world" with his labor, while Wagner proceeded to his last creation, "Parsifal", which marked the end of his passion for Schopenhauer and his return to the fold of Christianity. Their paths parted forever. It is said that Nietzsche truly knew only one person in his entire life, and that this person provided him with enough material to become the greatest psychologist of his time. This was Wagner.

In 1879 Nietzsche had to leave his post in Basel due to a long illness. He always had fragile health, and now he has become a completely sick person. He received a small pension and, on the advice of doctors, moved to a more favorable climate.

For the next ten years, Nietzsche wandered through Italy, the south of France and Switzerland in search of a place where he could feel better. What was he sick with? It seems like all at once. His eyesight was so weak that the philosopher was half blind (the doctor warned him to give up reading; Nietzsche could just as well have been advised to give up breathing). He suffered from severe headaches, due to which he sometimes did not get out of bed for several days; it was not a man, but a conglomeration of physical ailments and complaints. His tabletop collection of elixirs, pills, tonics, powders and tinctures made Nietzsche a very special being, one of the darkest hypochondriac philosophers in the world. And it was he who owned the concept of the superman! The obvious element of psychological compensation contained in this idea cannot move it from the central place it occupies among the most popular ideas of Nietzsche. We can say that she became that grain of sand around which the pearl of stupidity grew.

The superman appeared in the book Thus Spoke Zarathustra, a philosophical novel filled with almost unbearable bombast and seriousness, where the lack of a sense of humor is not softened by the author's attempts at "irony" and leaden "lightness." It is impossible to read it, like the opuses of Dostoevsky and Hesse, if you are not a teenager - but at that age, reading it often "changes life." And not always for the worse. Silly ideas are easy to isolate, and the rest become an antidote to many generally accepted ideas, stimulating deep self-reflection. Philosophy as such is hardly visible here. But the call to philosophizing - to knowing oneself - sounds very powerful, as do the characteristics of our being. “Is there an up and down here from now on? Doesn't it carry us through endless nothing? .. Is it true that an even deeper night is gathering around us? Do we need lanterns in the morning? Are we all still deaf to the sounds of gravediggers digging a grave for God? We still do not hear the stench of divine decay? .. The most holy and powerful in the world is bleeding at our feet ... There was no deed greater, and thanks to this deed, whoever came after us, he will live in history higher than everything what was before. " Almost a century later, such thoughts will begin to be expressed by the French existentialists - albeit not in such a fierce form - and they will be extolled as the vanguard of modern philosophy.

During Nietzsche's endless tour of resorts and places with mild winters, a friend of the philosopher Paul Reeu introduced him to a Russian noblewoman of German origin Lou Salome (Louise Gustavovna von Salome), who was twenty-one years old. Rheo and Nietzsche (separately and together) walked with her for a long time, trying to fill her head with their philosophical ideas. (Zarathustra was introduced to Lou as "the son I will never have" - ​​which could be considered a stroke of luck for little Zarathustra, whose name would have attracted too much attention at school.) an era when the possibility of a sexual revolution was not yet suspected. At first, all three announced that they would study philosophy together and live in a platonic m? Nage? trois. Then Reoe and Nietzsche (separately) declared their love for Lou and decided to propose to her. Unfortunately, Nietzsche made a ridiculous mistake: he asked Reo to convey his proposal to Lou. (This does not invalidate Nietzsche's significance as the greatest psychologist of his era, as anyone familiar with the love side of psychologists will attest.) A staged photograph of the whole trio, taken in a Lucerne studio, perfectly demonstrates who was in control of the situation. Two impressionable innocent young men (thirty-eight and thirty-three years old) harnessed to a cart, which is driven by a real twenty-one-year-old virgin with a whip in her hand. In the end, they were no longer able to continue this farce and dispersed. In desperation, Nietzsche wrote: "Tonight I will take enough opium to lose my mind," but on reflection, he decided that Lou was unworthy to become either the mother or the sister of the baby Zarathustra. (Lou, who took on the double surname Andreas-Salome in honor of her tame husband, a German professor, will become one of the brightest women of her time. Later, she will make a deep impression on two more leading figures of the era: will strike up a close friendship with an elderly Freud.)

Wintering in Nice, Turin, Rome or Menton, Nietzsche spent the summer at an altitude of "1500 meters above the world and even higher above people" - in Sils Maria, a lakeside village in the Swiss Engadine. Today Sils-Maria is a cozy little resort, but a simple room has survived here, in which Nietzsche usually lived and kept his first-aid kit. The mountains rise steeply above the lake, ending in the snow-capped peak of Bernina (height - 4048.6 meters), which marks the border with Italy. Behind the house, paths begin, along which you can go far into the mountains where Nietzsche loved to wander, reflecting on his philosophy and stopping at a lonely rock or a roaring stream to write down thoughts in a notebook. The atmosphere of these places - distant peaks, grandiose panoramas, a sense of lonely grandeur - is reflected in the tone of his works. When you see exactly where many of Nietzsche's creations are pondered, some of their merits and mistakes become clearer.

For the most part, Nietzsche lived all alone, renting inexpensive rooms, constantly working and eating in cheap restaurants - and all the while struggling with deafening headaches and debilitating ailments. Often he vomited for whole nights, and sometimes he could not work three or four days a week. But every year his next book was published at an amazing level. "Morning Dawn", "Merry Science", "Beyond Good and Evil" - all these works contain powerful criticism of Western civilization, its values ​​and psychology, as well as its contradictions. Nietzsche's style is clear and aphoristic, there are almost no extravagant ideas. This is not a systematic philosophy, but philosophizing of the highest order. Many (if not most) of the basic values ​​of Western man and Western civilization have been scrutinized and found to be empty. As Nietzsche wrote in his unpublished notebook: “The death of Christianity is from its morality(it is inseparable); this morality turns against the Christian God (the sense of truthfulness, highly developed by Christianity, begins to experience disgust to the falsity and isolation of all Christian interpretations of the world and history. A sharp turn back from "God is truth" to the fanatical belief "Everything is false." No one had ever done such destruction, although more than a hundred years earlier, Hume had already accomplished a significant amount of subversive philosophical work. (But the renaissance of the German metaphysical system required again resorting to crushing the foundations.)

All 1880s Nietzsche continued to work alone, unknown and unreadable, working the harder the more unbearable the isolation and lack of recognition became. It was not until 1888 that the Danish critic of Jewish origin Georg Brandes began lecturing on the philosophy of Nietzsche at the University of Copenhagen. Unfortunately, it was too late. In 1888, Nietzsche completed no less than four books, and cracks began to appear in his mind. He was a great thinker and knew it; it was necessary for the world to know this too. In Ecce Homo, he writes of Zarathustra as the tallest and deepest book that ever existed - a statement that always sets critical altimeters in motion and raises the question of trust. As if that weren't enough, he chooses for some chapters of the book the titles Why I Am So Wise, Why I Write Such Good Books, Why I Am Rock, warning them against alcohol, advising cocoa butter, and approving the work your intestines. The arrogance and preoccupation with oneself, characteristic of Zarathustra, vindictively reappear here in the form of mania.

In January 1889, everything comes to an end. While walking in Turin, Nietzsche fell in tears, clutching the neck of the horse, which was beaten by its owner. He was taken home, where he began to write postcards to Cosime Wagner ("I love you, Ariadne"), the King of Italy ("Dear Umberto ... All anti-Semites are shooting at me") and Jacob Burckhardt (signing "Dionysus"). Burckhardt realized what had happened and contacted another friend of Nietzsche, who immediately came for him.

Nietzsche was mentally ill and no longer recovered. It almost certainly would not have been cured today. Overwork, loneliness and suffering led to the disease, but the root cause was syphilis. He reached the third stage, which is characterized by "brain paralysis". After a short treatment at the clinic, Nietzsche was placed in the care of his mother. Now he was harmless. An almost constant painful trance reduced him to a vegetable state. In moments of enlightenment, he vaguely recalled his past life. Taking a book in his hand, he said: "After all, I also wrote good books?"

In 1897 his mother died and Nietzsche was looked after by his sister Elisabeth Förster-Nietzsche. This was the last person who, in theory, could take care of him. Nietzsche's younger sister Elisabeth married Bernard Föster, a failed schoolteacher who became a well-known anti-Semite. Nietzsche despised him and his ideas. Foerster founded a purebred Aryan colony in Paraguay called New Germany, bringing in poor peasants from Saxony there. It all ended in ruin and Förster's suicide. (Remnants of New Germany still exist in Paraguay, although the "master race" lives about the same as the local Indians, differing from them only in blond hair.) Returning to Germany and taking care of her sick brother, Elizabeth decided to make of him a great man. She transported it to Weimar, known for its cultural associations with Goethe and Schiller, hoping to create a Nietzsche archive here. Then she edited her brother's unpublished notebooks, introducing anti-Semitic ideas and flattering notes about herself. These notebooks were published under the title "The Will to Power". They were later cleared of the debris brought in by the great Nietzsche specialist Walter Kaufmann and became perhaps Nietzsche's greatest creation.

At the beginning of the work, Nietzsche gives a description of the coming era. “Skepticism about morality is decisive. The fall moral world interpretation, which does not find itself more sanctions, after he made an attempt to find refuge in some otherworldly: in the last analysis - nihilism. “Everything is meaningless (the impossibility of carrying out the interpretation of the world to the end, on which enormous power was spent, raises doubts whether everything in general interpretation of the world) ". It may seem that this denies the meaning of any philosophy, but Nietzsche playfully continues: “The entire cognitive apparatus is an abstractive and simplifying apparatus, aimed not at cognition, but at mastery things: "end" and "means" are as far from the true essence as "concepts." And then he shows what our knowledge is: “All our cognitive organs and senses developed only in relation to the conditions of conservation and growth. Confidence to reason and its categories, to dialectics - therefore, a high grade logic - only proves the proven utility her for life, but not its "truth". His psychological remarks are as insightful as ever, but now they lead from preliminary insights to fundamental (and dangerous) revelations. “Joy comes where there is a feeling of power.

Happiness is in the consciousness of power and victory that has gripped all of you.

Progress: strengthening the type, the ability to great strive; everything else is a mistake, a misunderstanding, a danger. "

Nietzsche lived to see the twentieth century, the nature of which he predicted so well. Finally, this expressive pale figure with a huge military mustache, a man who did not understand well who he was and where he was, died on August 25, 1900.

From the book of Elise Reclus. Sketch of his life and work the author Lebedev Nikolay Konstantinovich

III. Return to Europe. - Life in Paris. - The first works on geography. - Participation of Reclus in the Paris Commune. - Prison and deportation of Reclus from the borders of France. Returning from America to Europe, Reclus entered French soil as poor as he went to America.

From the book by Giambattista Vico the author Kissel Mikhail Antonovich

CHAPTER I LIFE AND WORK Vico's life is not rich in amusing incidents. As he himself admitted, "his soul harbored a great aversion to the noise of the Forum." The core of the biography of any thinker is the development of his teaching, it serves as a guiding star for the historian who

From the book The most piquant stories and fantasies of celebrities. Part 1 author Amills Roser

Friedrich Nietzsche None of them noticed him. You say you're free? I want you to tell me what is most important to you, not that you managed to escape the shackles. Friedrich Nietzsche Fri? Drich Wi? Lhelm Ni? Tssche (1844-1900) - German thinker, classical philologist, creator

From the book Petersburg in 1903-1910 the author Mintslov Sergey Rudolfovich

K. N. Veselovsky Life and works of S. R. Mintslov Outstanding bibliophile and bibliographer, entertaining storyteller and gifted prose writer, journalist and traveler, archaeologist and collector - all these definitions are equally applicable to Sergei Rudolfovich Mintslov and each of them

From the book The Scent of Dirty Laundry [collection] the author Armalinsky Mikhail

From the book of Spinoza author Stretern Paul

The Life and Works of Spinoza Baruch (or Benedict) de Spinoza was born on November 4, 1632 in Amsterdam to a family of Portuguese Sephardic Jews - their surname comes from the city of Espinosa in northwestern Spain. His family immigrated to Holland, where they were able to give up

From the book of Heidegger author Stretern Paul

The Life and Works of Heidegger Martin Heidegger was born on September 26, 1889 in the mountain village of Messkirche in southern Germany, just twenty kilometers north of Lake Constance and the Swiss border. There lived pious peasants, whose way of life remained almost

From the book of Hegel author Stretern Paul

The life and works of Hegel “... the greatest arrogance in presenting pure nonsense, in a set of senseless, wild word formations, which until now could only be heard in the insane asylum, finally found its expression in the works of Hegel; she became a tool

From the book of Kierkegaard author Stretern Paul

The Life and Works of Kierkegaard Søren Obu Kierkegaard was born in Copenhagen on May 5, 1813, the same year as the German composer Richard Wagner. Two significant figures for the culture of their time with opposite poles of genius. Kierkegaard was destined to become everything that he did not become

From the book of Kant author Stretern Paul

Life and Works of Kant Immanuel Kant was born on April 22, 1724 in Königsberg, at that time the capital of East Prussia (now the Russian city of Kaliningrad). His ancestors were immigrants from Scotland, who left there in the previous century and, possibly, were related to

From the book of Nietzsche author Stretern Paul

From the works of Nietzsche Aphorisms and popular phrases: God is dead. Live in danger. What's the best way out? Victory. Morning dawn There are no moral phenomena at all, there is only a moral interpretation of the phenomena. Beyond Good and Evil The best cure for love is everything

From the book of Schopenhauer author Stretern Paul

The Life and Works of Schopenhauer Schopenhauer again brings us back to a sinful earth. And although he was an unpleasant person, his philosophical works are admirable. Of all thinkers, he was the most subtle stylist after Plato. His philosophical system cannot leave you

From the book of Aristotle author Stretern Paul

The Life and Works of Aristotle At the promontory near the village of Stagira in Northern Greece, there is a not very talented modern monument to Aristotle. His expressionless face gazes over the uneven, forested hills at the blue Aegean Sea in the distance. A figure of virgin white

From the book of Derrida author Stretern Paul

The Life and Works of Derrida Key in the philosophy of Derrida, the philosophy of deconstructivism, is his statement: "There is nothing outside of the text." Despite this and no matter what textual form he takes, the fact that Jacques Derrida was born in 1930 in Algeria, according to

From the book of Machiavelli author Stretern Paul

The Life and Works of Machiavelli Niccolo Machiavelli was born in Florence on May 3, 1469. He came from an old Tuscan family that in the past achieved a high position in society, although he did not belong to the most influential families in Florence, such as the Medici or

From the book of Plato author Stretern Paul

The Life and Works of Plato Plato was a famous wrestler, and the name by which he is known to us was his wrestling nickname. It means "wide" and, apparently, alluded to his shoulders (or forehead, as some say). At birth in 428 BC NS. Plato received the name Aristocles. Was born


Read the biography of the philosopher thinker: facts of life, main ideas and teachings

FRIEDRICH NIETZSCHE

(1844-1900)

German philosopher, representative of the philosophy of life. In "The Birth of Tragedy from the Spirit of Music" (1872) he contrasted two principles of being - "Dionysian" and "Apollonian". In works written in the genre of philosophical and artistic prose, he criticized culture, preached immoralism ("Beyond Good and Evil", 1886). In the myth of the "superman", the cult of personality ("Thus Spoke Zarathustra", 1883-1884; "The Will to Power," published in 1889-1901) was combined by Nietzsche with the romantic ideal of the "man of the future."

The philosopher's father Karl Ludwig Nietzsche was born into the family of the Eulenburg superintendent. After graduating from the theological faculty of one of the best then German universities in Halle, K.L.

According to custom, the young pastor paid visits to his neighbors, including his colleague in the village of Pobles D. Yeler, a father of 11 children. Among them, the Reken pastor immediately singled out 17-year-old Francis. The novel developed rapidly: already on October 10, 1843, just on the groom's birthday, the wedding took place.

A year later, on October 15, 1844, the firstborn appeared in the family. The father named the boy in honor of the king Friedrich Wilhelm. In July 1846, a daughter, Elizabeth, was born, and two years later, a second son, Joseph.

But family happiness was short-lived. On July 30, 1849, Ludwig Nietzsche died, and six months later, little Joseph died. Later, Frederick, in his autobiographical notes, described a strange dream that turned out to be prophetic.

In the spring of 1850, Francis Nietzsche with her children moved to old Naumburg. Friedrich, who was not yet six years old, went to study at the men's folk school. A serious, slightly reserved and taciturn boy felt uncomfortable and lonely at school. This alienation of Friedrich from the collective remained forever.

Studying at school, and then at the Dome Gymnasium, was easy for Friedrich, although his amazing thoroughness and accuracy forced him to sit over his notebooks and textbooks until midnight. And already at five o'clock in the morning he got up and hurried to the gymnasium.

But the boy was more interested in poetry and especially music. His idols were the classics - Mozart, Haydn, Schubert, Mendelssohn, Beethoven and Bach. The same people who despised music, Nietzsche considered "spiritless creatures, like animals."

In the fall of 1858, Friedrich's mother received an invitation to continue her son's studies at the Pforte boarding school, one of the most prestigious educational institutions in Germany.

The worldview of Nietzsche that took shape in those years was reflected in an essay written by him in October 1861 about the poet Hölderlin, then unrecognized and almost unknown. His work, which glorified the fusion of man and nature in the spirit of antiquity and vividly reflected the discord between society and personality, attracted the young man by the fact that Hölderlin was able to express the moods inherent in Nietzsche at that time.

In April 1862, Nietzsche wrote two philosophical and poetic essays: "Rock and History" and "Free Will and Rock", which contain almost all the main ideas of his future works. There was a great library in Pforte. The young man enthusiastically read books by Shakespeare and Rousseau, Machiavelli and Emerson, Pushkin and Lermontov, Petofi and Chamisso, Geibel and Storm. George Gordon Byron became Nietzsche's favorite poet. In 1863 he wrote On the Demonic in Music and the sketch On the Essence of Music. Nietzsche studied literary history and aesthetics, biblical texts and ancient tragedies. The breadth of interests began to worry him, too, until he decided to turn to the study of philology, in which he hoped to find a science that could give scope not only to intellect, but also to feelings. Moreover, philology best suited his ardent love for antiquity, for the works of Heraclitus, Plato, Sophocles, Aeschylus, for ancient Greek lyrics.

In September 1864, Nietzsche finished his studies at Pfort and, after passing the exams, returned to Naumburg. He made the decision to continue his studies at the University of Bonn even earlier. At the request of his mother, Frederick promised to enroll at the university for a theological department. On October 16, after a short journey along the Rhine and the Palatinate, Nietzsche and Deissen arrived in Bonn.

After the almost barrack order of the Pforte, they were completely captured by the free and disorderly student life, feasting and obligatory foil fights. But very quickly Nietzsche cooled down to entertainment and increasingly began to think about moving to the department of philology, which he did in the fall of 1865. He studied at the seminar of one of the best German philologists Friedrich Ritchl and, when the mentor in the fall transferred to the University of Leipzig, followed him.

Once he accidentally bought a book by Arthur Schopenhauer "The World as Will and Representation". She shocked Nietzsche so much that he suffered from insomnia for two weeks. Only the need to attend classes, Nietzsche recalled, helped him overcome a deep mental crisis, during which he, by his own admission, was close to insanity. Schopenhauer's ideas turned out to be extremely close at that time to Nietzsche. They led Nietzsche to contemplate that dedicating his life to fulfilling his duty was a waste of time and energy. Man does his duty under pressure external conditions, and this is no different from an animal, which also acts solely according to circumstances. In the summer of 1867, Nietzsche met a young student, Erwin Rohde, who became his close friend for life. He was slightly younger than Nietzsche. The two of them spent their summer holidays, walking on foot through the Bohemian forest.

In the fall, Nietzsche was forced to temporarily interrupt his studies and undergo a year of military service. So he ended up in the second battery of the field artillery regiment, stationed in his native Naumburg. Nietzsche, who had not yet forgotten the strict regulations of Pforta, endured military service quite easily. But once during a training exercise, while riding a horse, he hit his chest hard against the front saddle bow. Nietzsche underwent an extremely painful course of treatment at the clinic of the famous Gallic physician Volkmann and, after five months of suffering, finally returned to Naumburg in August. Recognized as unfit for military service, Nietzsche resumed his studies at the university. He firmly decided to embark on the path of teaching.

It was at that time that one of the most significant and fateful events in his life took place - his acquaintance with the famous composer Richard Wagner. Nietzsche immersed himself in reading Wagner's aesthetic works Art and Revolution and Opera and Drama.

In December 1868, the Department of Greek Language and Literature was vacated at the University of Basel. They invited Nietzsche, whose works on ancient literature were repeatedly published in magazines. The candidate himself was flattered by the honor that had fallen out - to take the post of extraordinary university professor without a dissertation and even without a fully completed course of study. Another thing attracted him in the invitation - the opportunity to get closer to Wagner, who had lived since 1866 in Triebschen near Lucerne.

Before leaving, Nietzsche intended to defend his thesis in Leipzig based on his research on Diogenes Laertius. However, the faculty council unanimously decided that Nietzsche's published articles were a substitute for a dissertation, and on March 23 he was awarded a doctorate without the obligatory public defense, discussion, and examination.

Teaching at the university and the Pedagogium gymnasium under him soon began to weigh on Nietzsche, as did the cozy bourgeois atmosphere of Basel. He was increasingly covered by periods of melancholic depression, salvation from which he found in friendship with Wagner, to whose house Nietzsche strove at every opportunity, since it was only two hours from Basel to Lucerne. The immersion in the sublime world of art during frequent visits to Triebschen, Wagner's charming wife Cosim, contrasted strikingly with the measured and boring existence of Nietzsche in Basel. This disgusted Nietzsche with philology and science in general. In the sketches of that period, doubts in science are expressed quite definitely "The goal of science is the destruction of the world ... It is proved that this process took place already in Greece, although Greek science itself means very little. The task of art is to destroy the state. And this also happened in Greece. After that, science decomposed art. "

In such a situation, the message of the Wagners about their impending move to Bayreuth soon at the invitation of the Bavarian king affected Nietzsche like a thunderbolt. His ghostly Tribschen happiness was crumbling, and work in Basel seemed to lose all meaning. But fate, as it were, in return for Wagner gave him a new faithful friend. In April 1870, theology professor Franz Overbeck came to Basel and settled in the same house on Schützengraben where Nietzsche lived. They were quickly brought together by a common interest and, in particular, a critical attitude towards the Christian Church, as well as the same view of the outbreak of the Franco-German war.

After illness and returning to Basel, Nietzsche began attending lectures by the outstanding historian Jacob Burckhardt, full of skepticism and pessimism about the coming Nietzsche, he reconsidered his attitude to the Franco-German war and freed himself from the frenzy of patriotism. Now he began to regard Prussia as a militaristic force that is extremely dangerous for culture.

Not without the influence of Burckhardt, Nietzsche began to develop the tragic content of the story in the sketches for the drama "Empedocles", dedicated to the Sicilian philosopher, physician and poet of the 5th century BC. NS. In them, clear elements of the philosophy of late Nietzsche are already noticeable. In the empedoclesse doctrine of the transmigration of souls, he found one of the postulates of his own theory of eternal return.

On January 2, 1872, Nietzsche's book The Birth of Tragedy from the Spirit of Music appeared in Leipzig bookstores. It was conceived even before the Franco-German war, and is outlined schematically in the report "Greek Musical Drama", read at the university in January 1870.

Dedicated to Wagner, the work defined the foundations on which the birth of tragedy as a work of art rests. The ancient and modern lines are closely intertwined with each other in the constant juxtaposition of Dionysus, Apollo and Socrates with Wagner and Schopenhauer. Nietzsche attacked one of the main tenets of the Christian faith in eternal existence by the grace of God in the other world. It seemed absurd to him that death should be the atonement for the original sin of Adam and Eve. He expressed the idea that the stronger the will to live, the more terrible the fear of death. And how can you live without thinking about death, but knowing about its inexorableness and inevitability, not being afraid of it? The ancient Greeks, in order to withstand such an understanding of reality, created their own tragedy, in which there was, as it were, a complete immersion of a person into death.

Nietzsche firmly believed that science also has its limits. In the study of individual phenomena, in his opinion, in the end she certainly stumbles upon that beginning that is no longer possible to know rationally. And then science turns into art, and its methods - into the instincts of life. So art inevitably corrects and complements science. This position became the cornerstone of the foundations of Nietzsche's "philosophy of life."

In January - March 1872, Nietzsche made a series of public reports "On the Future of Our Educational Institutions," meaning not so much Swiss as Prussian gymnasiums and universities. There, for the first time, one of Nietzsche's main ideas sounded - the need to educate the true aristocracy of the spirit, the elite of society. According to Nietzsche, pragmatism should be present not in classical grammar schools, but in real schools that honestly promise to give practically useful knowledge, and not at all some kind of "education."

By the spring of 1873, between Nietzsche and Wagner, who had moved to Bayreuth and was busy organizing future famous music festivals, there was a still barely noticeable cooling. The Wagner couple did not like Nietzsche's growing propensity for a polemical revision of the moral foundations of mankind and the "shocking harshness" of his judgments. Wagner preferred to see the Basel professor as a talented and brilliant propagandist of his own views. But Nietzsche could not agree to such a role. And he still did not lose hope that Bayreuth would become a source of revival of European culture. Nietzsche conceived a series of pamphlets.

Out of about 20-24 planned, only four essays were written under the general title "Untimely Reflections". "David Strauss, Confessor and Writer" (1873), "On the Benefits and Harms of History for Life" (1874), "Schopenhauer as Educator" (1874) and "Richard Wagner in Bayreuth" (1875-1876).

In these reflections, Nietzsche emerged as a passionate defender of German culture, scourging philistinism and victorious intoxication after the creation of the empire.

This period coincided with such a sharp deterioration in health that Nietzsche in October 1876 received a year's leave for treatment and rest. Spending this time in the resorts of Switzerland and Italy, he worked in fits and starts on a new book, compiled in the form of aphorisms.

In May 1878, Nietzsche's book "Humanity Too Human" was published with the shocking subtitle "A Book for Free Minds." In it, the author publicly and without special ceremony broke with the past and its values: Hellenism, Christianity, Schopenhauer, Wagner.

This unexpected twist often comes down to the two most common versions. The first explains it with the usual envy of the failed musician towards Wagner, who once spoke rather dismissively about one of Nietzsche's musical compositions. The second version sees the reason in the influence on Nietzsche of the philosopher and psychologist Paul Rae, with whom Nietzsche became friends while living in Sorrento.

Fascinated by Nietzsche's betrayal, Wagner's admirers were numb with rage, and in August 1878 the maestro himself burst out with an extremely aggressive and spiteful article "The Public and Popularity". The name of Nietzsche was not mentioned in it, but it was clearly implied. His book was regarded as a consequence of illness, and brilliant aphorisms - as insignificant intellectually and deplorable morally. But Jacob Burckhardt spoke very highly of the book, saying that it "increased independence in the world."

The new year, 1879, brought Nietzsche incredible physical suffering: almost daily bouts of illness, continuous vomiting, frequent fainting, a sharp deterioration in vision. He was unable to continue teaching. In June, Nietzsche received his resignation at his request, with the appointment of an annual pension of 3,000 francs. He left Basel for Sils Maria, in the Upper Engadine valley. Hunched over, broken and aged by 10 years, half-blind, disabled, although he has not yet turned 35 years old.

In the life of Nietzsche, a period of endless wanderings began, in the summer in Switzerland, in the winter in Northern Italy. Modest cheap pensions in the Alps or on the Ligurian coast; wretchedly furnished cold rooms, where he wrote for hours, almost pressing his double glasses against a sheet of paper, until his sore eyes refused, rare lonely walks that saved terrible drugs from insomnia - chloral, veronal and, possibly, Indian hemp, constant headaches; frequent stomach cramps and vomiting cramps - this painful existence of one of the greatest minds of mankind lasted for 10 years.

But even in that terrible 1879, he created new books "Motley Thoughts and Sayings", "The Wanderer and His Shadow". And the next year, "Morning Dawn" appeared, which formulated one of the cornerstones of Nietzsche's ethics - "the morality of morals."

First, Nietzsche analyzed the connection between the decline of morality and the growth of human freedom. He believed that a free person "wants to depend on himself in everything, and not on any tradition." He considered the latter "the highest authority, which is obeyed not because he tells us what is useful, but because he generally orders." And from this followed a not yet expressed, but already outlined attitude to morality as to something relative, since an act that violates the established tradition always looks immoral, even if it is based on motives that "themselves laid the foundation traditions".

"Morning Dawn" had almost no success. The unusual structure of the book, more than half a thousand seemingly unrelated aphorisms could only cause confusion, and the German reading public, accustomed to the logical and pedantic sequence of philosophical treatises, was simply not able to overcome this strange work, much less understand it ...

As a continuation of "Morning Dawn" in the winter of 1881-1882, Nietzsche wrote in Genoa "Merry Science", which later came out in several editions with additions.

From this work a new dimension of Nietzsche's thought began, a never before seen attitude to millennial European history, culture and morality as to his personal problem: "I have absorbed the Spirit of Europe - now I want to strike back."

The thought of eternal return so deeply captured Nietzsche that in just a few months he wrote the magnificent poem Thus Spoke Zarathustra. He wrote it in February and late June - early July 1883 in Rapallo and February 1884 in Sils. A year later, Nietzsche created the fourth part of the poem, so intimate that it was published in only 40 copies at the expense of the author for close friends. Of this number, Nietzsche gave only seven, for there was no one else to give. Even the closest people - sister, Overbeck, Rode, Burckhardt - avoided any judgments in reply letters, like a burdensome duty, so incomprehensible to them were the pain and suffering of his feverish mind.

The time of work on "Zarathustra" is one of the most difficult periods in Nietzsche's life. In February 1883, Richard Wagner died in Venice. At the same time, Nietzsche experienced a serious spat with his mother and sister, outraged by his intention to marry a girl from Russia Lou Andreas Salome, a future famous writer, author of biographies of R. M. Rilke and Z. Freud, whom they considered "a completely immoral and obscene person." ... Nietzsche and his sister's engagement to the gymnasium teacher Bernhard Foerster, a Wagnerian and anti-Semite, had a hard time going through. In April 1884, Nietzsche wrote to Overbeck, "Cursed anti-Semitism caused a radical rift between me and my sister."

"Zarathustra" occupies an exclusive place in the work of Nietzsche. It is from this book in his mind that a sharp turn towards self-awareness of a rock-man takes place.

The book contains an unusually large number of half-hidden, poisonous parodies of the Bible, as well as sly attacks on Shakespeare, Luther, Homer, Goethe, Wagner, etc., etc., on many of the masterpieces of these authors. Nietzsche gives parodies with a single purpose: to show that man is still a formless mass, a material that requires a talented sculptor for his ennobling.

Only in this way will humanity surpass itself and pass into a different, higher quality - a superman will appear. For Nietzsche, the superman appears as the highest biological type, which relates to man in the same way as man relates to the monkey. Nietzsche, although he sees his ideal of man in individual outstanding personalities of the past, nevertheless considers them as a prototype of the future superman, who must appear, he must be raised. In Nietzsche, the superman turns into a cult of personality, a cult of "great people" and is the basis of a new mythology, presented with high artistic skill in the book "Thus Spoke Zarathustra".

Nietzsche ended the first part of Zarathustra with the words: "All gods are dead, now we want the superman to live."

After Zarathustra, everything that had been created earlier seemed so weak to Nietzsche that he had a chimerical plan to rewrite his earlier works. But due to his physical weakness, he limited himself to only new magnificent prefaces to almost all of his published books. And instead of revising the past, the opposite happened: Nietzsche wrote in the winter of 1885-1886 "a prelude to the philosophy of the future", the book "Beyond Good and Evil", in his words, a "terrible book" that this time flowed from my soul - very black. ”It was here that he, convinced that in man the creature and the creator have merged into one, destroys the creature in himself in order to save the creator.

"Beyond Good and Evil" was published at the expense of the author's modest funds. By the summer of next year, only 114 copies had been sold. Friends - Rode and Overbeck were silent; Burckhardt responded with a polite letter of thanks for the book and a purely formal compliment, clearly tortured. Desperate Nietzsche in August 1886 sent the book to the Danish literary critic Georg Brandes and the famous French historian and literary critic Hippolyte Taine. The first did not answer, and Teng responded unusually commendable, pouring balm on Nietzsche's soul. Meanwhile, it was in the book "Beyond Good and Evil", like no other, that Nietzsche revealed amazing insight, predicting the catastrophic processes of the future.

He reflected on the disintegration of European spirituality, the overthrow of past values ​​and norms, the uprising of the masses and the creation of a monstrous mass culture, the unification of people under the cover of their imaginary equality, the beginning of the struggle for domination over the entire globe, attempts to cultivate a new race of masters, tyrannical regimes as a product of democratic systems. These themes will be picked up and developed by the greatest philosophical minds of the 20th century - Husserl, Scheler, Spengler, Ortega-Gasset, Heidegger, Jaspers, Camus.

Nietzsche touched upon here the problem of double morality - masters and slaves. He wrote about two types of the same morality, existing "even in the same person, in the same soul." The differences between these types are determined by the difference in moral values. The morality of the masters is characterized by a high degree of self-respect, an exalted, proud state of mind, for the sake of which one can sacrifice both wealth and life itself. The moral of the slaves, on the other hand, is the moral of utility. A cowardly, petty, humiliating person, with humility enduring bad treatment for his own benefit - this is the representative of the morality of slaves, no matter how high the level of the social ladder he is. Slave morality longs for petty happiness and pleasure; severity and severity in relation to oneself is the basis of the morality of the masters.

To avoid misinterpretation around the book, Nietzsche, in the three weeks of July 1887, wrote as a supplement to it the polemical work "On the Genealogy of Morality", which, by the way, was also created at his expense.

In Nice in the fall of 1887, Nietzsche began the first sketches of the "major work" of his entire life he had conceived. In total, he wrote down 372 notes, divided into four sections: European nihilism, criticism of higher values, the principle of new assessment, discipline and selection. These are really not finished or polished notes, and not sparkling aphorisms that his readers are used to. The notes then collected by his sister and her collaborators from the Nietzsche Archive from 5,000 sheets of the philosopher's manuscript heritage made up one of his most sensational books, The Will to Power, although Nietzsche himself, as it turned out, was not responsible for its content and meaning. The compilers arbitrarily placed there not only the mentioned notes, but also many others, so that their total number exceeded a thousand and significantly distorted the general modality of the conceived composition.

In April 1888, Nice became too hot, the bright spring sun began to painfully affect Nietzsche's sore eyes. He had to change the place again, and he went to the climatically more suitable Turin. At this time, Brandes's lectures on the work of Nietzsche were very popular at the University of Copenhagen and attracted more than 300 listeners. Nietzsche was extremely pleased with this, but the feeling of joy was mixed with a touch of annoyance at the fact that he was recognized in Denmark, and in Germany, in his homeland, other idols, especially Richard Wagner, were worshiped. Wounded, Nietzsche decided to write a pamphlet "Casus Wagner". It was an elaborate work, brilliantly written, saturated with poisonous and destructive sarcasm.

The pamphlet was printed in mid-September 1888, while Nietzsche was still in Sils. At the end of the month, he again went to Turin, where his health suddenly improved dramatically: insomnia and headaches disappeared, the attacks of nausea that had tormented him for 15 years disappeared; Nietzsche passionately threw himself into work, took daily walks along the Po, and read a lot. In the evenings he went to concerts or improvised for hours in his room on the piano. He felt great, as he immediately informed his mother and friends! But at the same time, he breaks off relations with Wagner's entourage, with an old and good acquaintance, the Hamburg accompanist Hans von Bülow, as well as with the writer and loyal friend Malvida von Meisenbug.

At the end of 1888, Nietzsche was seized with excruciating anxiety. On the one hand, the features of megalomania began to appear more and more clearly in him: he felt that his finest hour was approaching. In a letter to Strindberg in December 1888, Nietzsche wrote: "I am strong enough to split the history of mankind into two pieces." On the other hand, doubts and vague fears grew in him that the world would never recognize his brilliant prophecies and would not understand his thoughts, just as Casus Wagner did not understand him.

In a feverish rush, Nietzsche wrote two works at the same time - "Twilight of Idols" and "Antichrist", the first part of "A Revaluation of All Values." Nietzsche himself, however, did not want to publish his last work yet, nursing a utopian idea: to publish it simultaneously in seven European languages ​​with a circulation of 1 million in each. It was published only in 1895, and with numerous bills.

Nietzsche sharply criticized Christian churches and those people who called themselves Christians, in fact, were not them. He contrasted the life of Jesus with the three synoptic gospels, in which, according to him, the first attempts were made to create a system of Christian dogmas in the issue of a negative attitude towards the world.

Even before finishing work on "Antichrist", Nietzsche decides to create a prelude to "Reappraisal" in the form of a biography and annotations of his books, so that readers understand what he is. This is how the idea of ​​the work "Eso homo" arose, in which Nietzsche tried to explain the reasons for his chill towards Wagner and show how it matured in his books over the years. What are the titles of chapters alone - "Why I am so wise", "Why I write such good books", "Why I am rock"!

The first symptoms of Nietzsche's imbalance soon began to appear. He was in a hurry to publish his obviously incomplete works, although his already broken mind dreamed of nightmares and dangers emanating from the military might of the German Empire. He was seized by fear of the Hohenzollern dynasty, Bismarck, anti-Semitic circles, the church. They were all insulted in his last books, and Nietzsche expected severe persecution. As if warning them, he sketched a letter to Kaiser Wilhelm: "By this I am doing the Kaiser of the Germans the greatest honor that can fall to his lot: I am sending him the first copy of the book in which the fate of mankind is decided."

The incipient departure from understanding the real world led Nietzsche to a daring plan to unite all European countries into a single anti-German league in order to put on a straitjacket on the Reich or provoke it into a knowingly hopeless war against a united Europe.

The circumstances and reasons for the emotional distress of Friedrich Nietzsche have not been thoroughly clarified. Sister Elizabeth wrote that apoplectic stroke was the result of nervous exhaustion from overwork and the harmful effects of sedatives.

"As for the medical diagnosis, it read: progressive paralysis. Usually it is a dysfunction of the brain caused by an external infection, often a consequence of the previous syphilis."

Information about Nietzsche's disease is extremely scarce and contradictory. According to some reports, he allegedly contracted syphilis while a student at the University of Bonn in 1864-1865, after visiting a brothel in Cologne. Thomas Mann also adhered to this version in the article "The Philosophy of Nietzsche in the Light of Our Experience". However, it is more likely that if Nietzsche had syphilis, it was while studying in Leipzig. Although here, too, it is too embarrassing that the names of the doctors with whom Nietzsche was treated remained unknown, and rumors about this treatment are rather deaf. It is unlikely that the disease then lurked for 20 years, besides, after a mental breakdown, Nietzsche lived for another 11 years and died of pneumonia, which also does not fit into the diagnosis of progressive paralysis.

A tragic breakdown in the psyche of Nietzsche occurred between January 3 and 6, 1889. The rapid clouding of reason led to a confusion of all concepts. He forgot that he was living in Turin, it seemed to him that he was in Rome and was preparing to convene a congress of European powers in order to unite them against the hated Prussian-Germany. Nietzsche stigmatizes Italy's entry into an alliance with Germany and Austria-Hungary in 1882 and in a letter to the Italian king demands its immediate break.

Nietzsche's confusion is evident in his notes between January 3 and 5. So, on January 3, he wrote to his longtime acquaintance Mete von Salis: "The world has been transformed, God is on Earth again, do you not see how the heavens are rejoicing? I took over my empire, I will throw the Pope in prison and I will order the execution of Wilhelm, Bismarck and Stocker ".

"With Wilhelm, Bismarck and all anti-Semites finished. Antichrist Friedrich Nietzsche Fromentin."

Friedrich Nietzsche lost not only his mind. The legacy of this intelligence was quickly and unashamedly taken over by a sister who returned from Paraguay after the suicide of her husband entangled in financial machinations. She quickly removed Peter Gast from participating in the preparation of the collected works of Nietzsche, who, together with Overbeck, opposed all sorts of forgeries and arbitrary editing of manuscripts from the archive.

In August 1896, my sister, along with a huge archive, moved to Weimar and prepared a biography of Frederick there, hoping that the spiritual life of Weimar, incomparable with the provincial provincial Naumburg, would make it easier for her to publish a book that became an example of an amazingly shameless perk of blood dear and spiritually infinitely distant for her. brother's life.

After purchasing a large house on Luisenstrasse to house the archive, Elizabeth moved the patient to Weimar. Immersed in the deepest apathy, Nietzsche did not seem to notice either the move to a new place or the death of his mother, who died in April 1897. Nietzsche's stay in Weimar was short-lived. In late August 1900, he caught a cold, contracted pneumonia, and died quietly at noon. August 25, 1900. The prophetic line from Zarathustra came true: "Oh, noon abyss! When will you pull my soul back into yourself?"

Three days later, the burial took place at the family site of the cemetery in Roken, where his parents and brother were buried. Speaking at the mourning ceremony, the famous German historian and sociologist Kurt Breisig called Nietzsche "a man who showed the way to a new future for humanity," a thinker who opposed the magic of Buddha, Zarathustra and Jesus. "

* * *
You have read the biography of a philosopher, the facts of his life and the main ideas of his philosophy. This biographical article can be used as a report (abstract, essay or synopsis)
If you are interested in biographies and teachings of other (Russian and foreign) philosophers, then read (content on the left) and you will find a biography of any great philosopher (thinker, sage).
Basically, our site (blog, collection of texts) is dedicated to the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche (his ideas, works and life), but in philosophy everything is connected and you cannot understand one philosopher without reading those thinkers who lived and philosophized before him ...
... The 19th century is the century of the philosophers of the revolutionaries. In the same century, European irrationalists appeared - Arthur Schopenhauer, Kierkegaard, Friedrich Nietzsche, Bergson ... Schopenhauer and Nietzsche are representatives of nihilism (philosophy of negation) ... In the 20th century, among the philosophical teachings, one can distinguish - existentialism - Heidegger, Jaspers, Sartre. .. The starting point of existentialism is the philosophy of Kierkegaard ...
Russian philosophy (according to Berdyaev) begins with the philosophical letters of Chaadaev. The first well-known Russian philosopher in the West is Vladimir Soloviev. Lev Shestov was close to existentialism. The most widely read Russian philosopher in the West is Nikolai Berdyaev.
Thank you for reading!
......................................
Copyright:

philosopher, culturologist, representative of irrationalism. He sharply criticized the religion, culture and morals of his time and developed his own ethical theory. Nietzsche was more of a literary than an academic philosopher, and his writings are aphoristic in nature. Nietzsche's philosophy had a great influence on the formation of existentialism and postmodernism, and also became very popular in literary and artistic circles. Interpretation of his works is rather difficult and still causes a lot of controversy.

Biography

Philosophy

Nietzsche's philosophy is not organized into a system. Nietzsche considered the "will to the system" unscrupulous. His research covers all possible questions of philosophy, religion, ethics, psychology, sociology, etc. Inheriting Schopenhauer's thought, Nietzsche opposes his philosophy to the classical tradition of rationality, questioning and questioning all the "evidence" of reason. The greatest interest Nietzsche is raised by questions of morality, "reassessment of all values." Nietzsche was one of the first to question the unity of the subject, the causality of will, truth as a single foundation of the world, the possibility of rational substantiation of actions. His metaphorical, aphoristic presentation of his views earned him the fame of a great stylist. However, for Nietzsche, an aphorism is not just a style, but a philosophical attitude - not to give final answers, but to create tension of thought, to enable the reader himself to "resolve" the arising paradoxes of thought.

Nietzsche clarifies Schopenhauer's "will to live" as "the will to power", since life is nothing but the desire to expand its power. However, Nietzsche criticizes Schopenhauer for nihilism, for his negative attitude towards life. Considering the entire culture of mankind as a way in which a person adapts to life, Nietzsche proceeds from the primacy of self-affirmation of life, its abundance and fullness. In this sense, any religion and philosophy should glorify life in all its manifestations, and everything that denies life, its self-affirmation, is worthy of death. Nietzsche considered Christianity to be such a great denial of life. Nietzsche was the first to declare that "there are no moral phenomena, there is only a moral interpretation of phenomena," thereby subjecting all moral propositions to relativism. According to Nietzsche, healthy morality should glorify and strengthen life, its will to power. Any other morality is decadent, a symptom of illness, decadence. Humanity instinctively uses morality in order to achieve its goal - the goal of expanding its power. The question is not whether morality is true, but whether it serves its purpose. We observe this "pragmatic" formulation of the question in Nietzsche's attitude to philosophy and culture in general. Nietzsche stands up for the arrival of such "free minds" who will set themselves the conscious goals of "improving" humanity, whose minds will no longer be "brainwashed" by any morality, by any restrictions. Such a "supermoral", "beyond good and evil" person, Nietzsche calls "superman".

With regard to knowledge, the "will to truth" Nietzsche again adheres to his "pragmatic" approach, asking "why do we need truth?" For the purposes of life, truth is not needed, rather an illusion, self-deception leads humanity to its goal - self-improvement in the sense of expanding the will to power. But "free minds", the elect, must know the truth in order to be able to control this movement. These chosen ones, immoralists of humanity, creators of values ​​must know the reasons for their actions, give an account of their goals and means. Nietzsche devotes many of his works to this "school" of free minds.

Mythology

The figurative and metaphorical nature of Nietzsche's works allows us to single out a certain mythology in him:

  • Nietzsche proceeds from the duality (dualism) of culture, where the beginnings of Apollo and Dionysus are fighting. Apollo ( greek god light) symbolizes order and harmony, and Dionysus (Greek god of winemaking) - darkness, chaos and excess power. These beginnings are not equivalent. The dark god is older. Force brings order, Dionysus begets Apollo. Dionysian will (der Wille - in Germanic languages ​​means desire) always turns out will to power is an interpretation of the ontological basis of existence. Nietzsche, like Marx, was influenced by Darwinism. The entire course of evolution and the struggle for survival (eng. struggle for existence) is nothing more than a manifestation of this will to power. The sick and the weak must die, and the strongest must win. Hence Nietzsche's aphorism: "Push the one who is falling!" effective help to the neighbor - to give him the opportunity to reach an extreme, in which it will be possible to rely only on his instincts for survival, in order to be reborn or perished from there. This manifests Nietzsche's faith in life, in its possibility of self-rebirth and resistance to everything fatal. "What does not kill us makes us stronger"!
  • As a man evolved from a monkey, so as a result of this struggle, man must evolve into a Superman (Übermensch). Reason and all the so-called. spiritual values ​​are just a tool for achieving domination. Therefore, the superman differs from ordinary people primarily by his invincible will. He is more of a genius or rebel than a ruler or hero. A true superman is a destroyer of old values ​​and a creator of new ones. He does not rule over the herd, but over entire generations. However, the will does not move forward. Its main enemies are its own manifestations, what Marx called the force of alienation of the spirit. The only bondage of a strong-willed man is his own promises. By creating new values, the superman gives rise to a culture - the Dragon or The spirit of gravity like ice that fetters the river of will. Therefore, a new superman must come - the Antichrist. It does not destroy old values. They have exhausted themselves, for, as Nietzsche argues, God is dead. The era of European nihilism has come, to overcome which the Antichrist must create new values. He will oppose the humble and envious morality of slaves morality of masters... However, then a new Dragon will be born and a new superman will come. So it will be endlessly, for in this it is manifested eternal return... One of the basic concepts in Nietzsche's philosophy is decadence.

Quotes

"" Purpose "," need "quite often turns out to be just a specious excuse, an additional self-blinding vanity that does not want to admit that the ship follows the current in which it accidentally hit "

"... As if the values ​​are hidden in things and the whole point is only to master them!"

“Oh, how comfortable you have settled down! You have a law and an evil eye for someone who is only turned against the law in thought. We are free - what do you know about the torment of responsibility in relation to yourself! "

“Our entire sociology knows no other instinct than the herd instinct, that is, summed zeros - where each zero has "the same rights", where it is considered a virtue to be zero ... "

"Virtue is refuted if you ask" why? "..."

“If you want to get high, use your own legs! Do not let yourself be carried, do not sit on other people's shoulders and heads! "

"If you peer into the abyss for a long time, the abyss will begin to peer into you."

“There are two types of loneliness. For one, loneliness is the flight of a sick person, for another it is an escape from the sick "

"There are two ways to save you from suffering: quick death and lasting love"

"Every slightest step on the field of free thinking and personally shaped life is always won at the cost of spiritual and physical torment."

"Criticism of modern philosophy: the fallacy of the starting point, as if there are" facts of consciousness "- as if in the field of self-observation there is no place for phenomenalism"

"Whoever is attacked by his time is not yet far enough ahead of him - or lagged behind him."

"We are the heirs of the vivisections of conscience and self-crucifixion that have taken place over two millennia."

"Alone with ourselves, we imagine everyone is simpler than ourselves: in this way we give ourselves a rest from our neighbors."

"Nothing is bought for a higher price than a particle of human reason and freedom ..."

"Nothing strikes so deeply, nothing destroys so much as" impersonal duty ", as a sacrifice to the moloch of abstraction ..."

"He who knows himself is his own executioner"

“The same thing happens to a person as to a tree. The more it strives upward, towards the light, the deeper its roots go into the earth, downward, into darkness and depth - towards evil. "

"Death is close enough so that you can not be afraid of life"

“Man has gradually become a fantastic animal, which in to a greater extent than any other animal, tries to justify the condition of existence: from time to time it should seem to a person that he knows why he exists, his breed is not able to prosper without periodic trust in life, without faith in the mind inherent in life "

"A person prefers to desire nothingness, rather than not desire at all"

“Humanity is more a means than an end. Humanity is just an experimental material "

"For moral values ​​to achieve dominance, they must rely solely on the forces and passions of an immoral nature."

"I do not run the closeness of people: just the distance, the eternal distance that lies between man and man, drives me into loneliness."

“... But that which convinces does not thereby become true: it is only convincing. Note for donkeys. "

  • "God is dead" (This phrase is found in the work "Thus spoke Zarathustra")
  • "God is dead; because of his compassion for people, God died "(" Thus Spoke Zarathustra ", chapter" On the Compassionate ")
  • “'God himself cannot exist without wise men,' said Luther, and rightly so; but "God can even less exist without stupid people" - this Luther did not say! "
  • "If God wanted to become an object of love, then he should first renounce the office of a judge administering justice: a judge, and even a merciful judge, is not an object of love."
  • "An evil god is needed no less than a good one - after all, you owe your own existence not to tolerance and philanthropy ... What is the use of a god who knows no anger, envy, cunning, ridicule, revenge and violence?"
  • “Without the dogmas of faith, no one could live even a moment! But by the same token, these dogmas have by no means been proven. Life is not an argument at all; delusion could be among the living conditions "
  • "The theme for the great poet could be the boredom of the Most High after the seventh day of Creation."
  • "In every religion, a religious person has an exception."
  • "The supreme thesis:" God forgives the repentant "- the same in translation: forgives the one who obeys the priest ..."
  • "The dogma of the" immaculate conception "? .. Why, they have discredited the conception ..."
  • "A pure spirit is a pure lie"
  • "Fanatics are colorful, and humanity is more pleased to see gestures than to listen to arguments."
  • “The word 'Christianity' is based on a misunderstanding; in fact, there was one Christian, and he died on the cross "
  • "The founder of Christianity believed that people did not suffer from anything more than from their sins: it was his delusion, the delusion of the one who felt without sin, who lacked experience here!"
  • “The teaching and the apostle who does not see the weakness of his teaching, his religion, etc., blinded by the authority of the teacher and reverence for him, usually has more strength than the teacher. Never before has a person's influence and deeds grown without blind disciples. "
  • "Faith saves - therefore, it lies"
  • "Buddhism does not promise, but keeps its word, Christianity promises everything, but does not keep its word"
  • "The martyrs only harmed the truth"
  • "A person forgets his guilt when he confesses it to another, but this latter usually does not forget it."
  • “Blood is the worst witness of the truth; blood poison the purest teaching to the point of madness and hatred of hearts "
  • “Virtue only gives happiness and a certain bliss to those who firmly believe in their virtue — not the more refined souls whose virtue consists in deep distrust of themselves and of any virtue. In the end, even here “faith makes you blessed”! - and not, take good note of this, virtue! "
  • "Moral people feel self-righteous with remorse."
  • Survival School: What Doesn't Kill Us Makes Us Stronger
  • “Love, perhaps, your neighbor as yourself. But above all, be those who love yourself. "
  • "The Jewish stockbroker is the most heinous invention of the entire human race." (This phrase was added by Nietzsche's sister, in the years of his madness, Nietzsche himself despised anti-Semites)
  • "You go to a woman - take a whip"
  • "Without music life would be a mistake"
  • "Blessed are those who forget, for they do not remember their own mistakes."

Artworks

Major works

  • "The Birth of Tragedy, or Hellenism and Pessimism" ( Die geburt der tragödie, 1871)
  • "Untimely Reflections" ( Unzeitgemässe Betrachtungen, 1872-1876)
  1. "David Strauss as Confessor and Writer" ( David Strauss: der Bekenner und der Schriftsteller, 1873)
  2. "On the benefits and harms of history for life" ( Vom Nutzen und Nachtheil der Historie für das Leben, 1874)
  3. "Schopenhauer as an educator" ( Schopenhauer als erzieher, 1874)
  4. "Richard Wagner in Bayreuth" ( Richard Wagner in Bayreuth, 1876)
  • “Human, too human. A book for free minds "( Menschliches, Allzumenschliches, 1878)
  • "Mixed opinions and sayings" ( Vermischte Meinungen und Sprüche, 1879)
  • "The Wanderer and His Shadow" ( Der Wanderer und sein Schatten, 1879)
  • "Morning dawn, or thoughts of moral prejudice" ( Morgenröte, 1881)
  • "Fun Science" ( Die fröhliche Wissenschaft, 1882, 1887)
  • “Thus spoke Zarathustra. A book for everyone and for no one "( Also sprach Zarathustra, 1883-1887)
  • “On the other side of good and evil. Prelude to the philosophy of the future "( Jenseits von Gut und Böse, 1886)
  • “Towards a genealogy of morality. A polemic composition "( Zur Genealogie der Moral, 1887)
  • "Casus Wagner" ( Der fall wagner, 1888)
  • "Twilight of idols, or how they philosophize with a hammer" ( Götzen-Dämmerung, 1888), the book is also known as "Twilight of the Gods"
  • "Antichrist. Damnation to Christianity "( Der antichrist, 1888)
  • Ecce Homo. How they become themselves "( Ecce homo, 1888)
  • "The will to power" ( Der wille zur macht, 1886-1888, ed. 1901), a book collected from Nietzsche's notes by editors E. Förster-Nietzsche and P. Gast. As M. Montinari proved, although Nietzsche planned to write the book The Will to Power. Experience of revaluation of all values ​​"( Der Wille zur Macht - Versuch einer Umwertung aller Werte), which is mentioned at the end of the work "Towards a Genealogy of Morality", but abandoned this idea, while the drafts served as material for the books "Twilight of Idols" and "Antichrist" (both written in 1888).

Other works

  • Homer and Classical Philology ( Homer und die klassische Philologie, 1869)
  • "On the future of our educational institutions" ( Über die Zukunft unserer Bildungsanstalten, 1871-1872)
  • "Five prefaces to five unwritten books" ( Fünf Vorreden zu fünf ungeschriebenen Büchern, 1871-1872)
  1. "On the pathos of truth" ( Über das Pathos der Wahrheit)
  2. "Thoughts on the future of our educational institutions" ( Gedanken über die Zukunft unserer Bildungsanstalten)
  3. "Greek state" ( Der griechische staat)
  4. “The relationship between Schopenhauer's philosophy and German culture ( Das Verhältnis der Schopenhauerischen Philosophie zu einer deutschen Cultur)
  5. "Homeric competition" ( Homers Wettkampf)
  • "About truth and lie in an extramoral sense" ( Über Wahrheit und Lüge im außermoralischen Sinn, 1873)
  • "Philosophy in the tragic era of Greece" ( Die Philosophie im tragischen Zeitalter der Griechen)
  • "Nietzsche against Wagner" ( Nietzsche contra wagner, 1888)

Juvenilia

  • "From my life" ( Aus meinem Leben, 1858)
  • "About music" ( Über Musik, 1858)
  • "Napoleon III as President" ( Napoleon III als Praesident, 1862)
  • "Fatum and History" ( Fatum und Geschichte, 1862)
  • "Free will and fate" ( Willensfreiheit und Fatum, 1862)
  • "Can an envious person be really happy?" ( Kann der Neidische je wahrhaft glücklich sein?, 1863)
  • "About moods" ( Über Stimmungen, 1864)
  • "My life" ( Mein leben, 1864)

Bibliography

  • Nietzsche F. Complete works: In 13 volumes / Per. with him. V. M. Bakuseva; Ed. advice: A. A. Guseinov and others; Institute of Philosophy RAS. - M .: Cultural revolution, 2005.
  • Nietzsche F. Complete works: In 13 volumes: T. 12: Drafts and sketches, 1885-1887. - M .: Cultural revolution, 2005 .-- 556 with ISBN 5-902764-07-6
  • Markov, B.V. Man, state and God in the philosophy of Nietzsche. - SPb .: Vladimir Dal: Russkiy Ostrov, 2005 .-- 786 p. - (World Nietzschean). - ISBN 5-93615-031-3 ISBN 5-902565-09-X

Notes (edit)

Links

The essay is dedicated to one of the titans of modern thought, whose fame has not weakened for more than a hundred years, although few of the amateurs understand his teachings. The author tried, to the best of his student's abilities, to show not the tragedy of Nietzsche (this was brilliantly done by Stefan Zweig, Karl Jaspers and others), but the inner, immanently inherent philosophical meaning of this tragedy.

Nietzsche Friedrich (1844 - 1900) : German philosopher-voluntarist, irrationalist and modernist, the founder of the European "philosophy of life", poet. Developing the ideas of the "new morality", the superman, Nietzsche at the end of his life came to a complete rejection of Christianity and even wrote a treatise called "Antichrist" (Der Antichrist; usually translated as "Anti-Christian"). In 1889 he fell into insanity and was insane to death. He had a significant impact on various philosophical and social movements of the twentieth century: from fascism and racism to pluralism and liberalism. Nietzsche's ideas are abundantly used by the enemies of Christianity to fight it.

Over the past decades, "Nietzscheism" has become a kind of intellectual fashion for young people, and Nietzsche is the idol of many educated people... To a large extent, this phenomenon is associated with moral licentiousness and selfishness, which have become the principles of modern society. “Nietzsche,” writes one of the new authors, is the only one who, at each stage of each new reading, confirmed deeper and deeper only my own experiences"1. Without a careful study of the life of a philosopher, it is impossible to understand either the specifics of his work, or the reasons for his colossal influence. After all, these reasons lie in the coincidence of many subjective factors of his and our time. And according to I. Garin, an ardent supporter of his ideas, "the philosophy of Nietzsche is the revelation of the inner world of Nietzsche" 2.

Friedrich Nietzsche was born on October 15, 1844 in the family of a pastor. Despite the early death of his father (1848), which deeply affected the boy, he received a good upbringing with a very strong religious component. As a child, admiring the music or the singing of the choir, he dreamily contemplated his favorite subjects, imagined the singing of angels. But not only the gospel stories, but also the teaching had a great influence on him: concepts such as chastity, purity, compassion strongly touched his heart.

The development of the soul of a philosopher is largely reflected in his poems. A wonderful poem belongs to the young years:

You have wounded me with new slander.
Well! The path to the grave is clearer to me ...
A monument you poured out of anger,
Soon my quivering chest will press down on me.
You will sigh ... For how long ?! Sweet revenge eyes
Will light up again to a new enemy;
You will languish all night long
"I can't live without revenge," you say, "I can't!"
And now I know: from a raw grave
I regret not my sad age again,
Not your own, broken forces by cunning,
And about: why are you, my enemy - a man!

Here we see a deep understanding of the Christian ideal. In another poem, also quite early, Nietzsche seriously warns against the substitution of sensual passion for love:

Sensuality will ruin
All the sprouts of love ...
Passion will forget love
Dust in the blood will flash.
You are a greedy dream
Do not touch youth
Or merciless fire,
Sensual fire
Courage will melt
In fiery blood
Will not leave ashes
From your love.

This is how Nietzsche thought in his youth; but already in those years he wrote other poems that reveal before us the demonic power that dwelt in his soul. The later period of his life we ​​consider, the more influential this force turns out to be.

It is pouring into me again like a wave
Living blood through the open window ...
Here, here it is aligned with my head
And whispers: I am freedom and love!
I can taste and smell blood ...
Its wave follows me ...
I choke, throw myself onto the roof ...
But you will not leave: it is more formidable than fire!
I run into the street ... I marvel at the miracle:
Living blood reigns and is everywhere ...
All people, streets, houses - everything is in it! ..
She does not blind them, like me, eyes,
And fertilizes the good of life for people,
But I feel stifling: I see blood everywhere!

Perhaps such a poem was only an attempt to create a poetic image? - No, we meet echoes of the same "nightmare" in his diaries and letters, in his very philosophical works. But the poems are the clearest example. Poetry, like music, early became a favorite pastime of Nietzsche, which already in childhood, according to his best biographer D. Halevy, “was seized by the tyrannical instinct of creativity” 3.

Love and do not be ashamed of crazy pleasures,
Say openly that you pray for evil
And the wonderful scent of ferocious crimes
Breathe in until the bliss is gone.

For many, Nietzsche is habitually such an "immoralist" who cheerfully chooses evil instead of good and is convinced that no one has the right to demand that he be accountable for it. In fact, as we can see, this image is much deeper and more complex. But Nietzsche, at least at some points in his life, would like to see himself as the idol he has become. The main motive is the heroism of a person who is not afraid to remain completely alone as everything human is rejected by him and given over to ridicule. Overcoming the fear of loneliness is one of the most convincing indicators of greatness: it is no coincidence that the hermits have become guiding stars for many generations, for centuries. Nietzsche, who did not have a family, did not recognize the values ​​of society, wanted to be a kind of "hermit" of philosophy. Moreover, he wanted to come out of the "wilderness" like a prophet in order to usher in a new era - the era of the superman. Therefore, in his most successful work, he puts his ideas into the mouth of the prophet, but the truth is not Christian, but Persian Zarathustra.

My sail is my thought, and the helmsman is a free spirit,
And proudly my ship sails in the bosom of the waters,
And the voice of conscience, a noble element,
Will save, save me: I am with natural strength
Alone I go to battle, and the ocean roars ...

Admirers of Nietzsche imagine him as such: like Doctor Faust, who by force (although with the help of the devil) wrests its secrets from nature. “They are holy to us! - said at the beginning of the twentieth century. writer Hermann Hesse. “We want to rejoice in them, we want to admire in reverent timidity the powerful, high columns supporting the vault of these temples ... Faust and Zarathustra we call temples and holy places” 3. Here the central ideal is freedom that does not recognize God... It presupposes a new religious faith - the belief of man in his own strength, and a new religious worship - the "superman." But truly prophetic were Nietzsche's deep words about himself:

From the diary

If the enemies are all killed,
I want to resurrect again
Those whose names are forgotten
To kill them again.
Scary: I'm afraid he will laugh
Fate wickedly over the heart:
I have to fight with myself
Cutting yourself up like a slave.

The main underlying motive of the work of Friedrich Nietzsche, and especially his philosophy, main engine and at the same time, the threat to his life is a mysterious force, which acted through him, as through a genius, but at the same time in itself, and Nietzsche was aware of this. Sometimes he was afraid of her, more often - he was proud of her, as his highest difference from "mere mortals." It follows from this that the ideal of complete freedom, self-sufficiency is a misinterpretation of the philosopher's aspirations. Indeed, since Nietzsche lost faith in God, he no longer found an ideal for himself that he could bow down to: each new ideal turned out to be false, and he devoted all his work, in fact, to exposing the ideals - public good, morality4, humanism5, independence (for example, female, because the issue of emancipation was then on the wave of popularity) 6, reason7, scientific objectivity8 and many others. etc. It was a radical "revaluation of values", but not with the aim of rejecting all values ​​in general, but with the aim of creating new values.

Who was supposed to create these new values? Nietzsche himself wrote about himself: “I am one of those who dictate values ​​for thousands of years. To immerse your hands in the ages, as in soft wax, to write, as on copper, the will of a thousand people ... behold, Zarathustra will say, the bliss of the creator ”9. But Zarathustra is only the "prophet" of the superman. How can he dictate values ​​to him in advance? Reflecting on his "Zarathustra" four years after it was written (and a year before his madness), Nietzsche will write words that are difficult for the reader to immediately understand, but which are very important for the author himself: “Zarathustra once defined his task with all the severity ... there is approving up to justification, up to redemption of all that has passed ”10. This means that his mission concerns not only the future, but also the past - philosophy, embodied in the image of Zarathustra, was supposed to justify all of humanity, its aimless and meaningless existence, before the scrutiny of a thinker. But how, if this existence is indeed aimless and meaningless, could it be justified, that is, philosophically comprehended? The answer to this question is perhaps the main goal of Nietzsche as a philosopher who denied God and was looking for a replacement for Him. He found her, as it seemed to him, in the idea progress... Humanity, in accordance with Darwin's theory, is itself only an intermediate species: in the course of natural selection (the struggle of strong individuals with weak ones), it has yet to become a super-humanity. This shows how unfair it is to call Nietzsche a humanist (from the word humanum - human). In his opinion, man is only that which must be overcome. And the young Hermann Hesse in 1909 happily put Nietzsche on the same pedestal with his idols - Darwin and Haeckel, the founder of social Darwinism, for the exaltation of the idea of ​​progress: “we rejoice in a new wonderful present and long for an even better, more beautiful future” 11.

It turns out that Nietzsche himself finds himself in the middle between the past and the future, which has not yet arrived. But he himself did not yet consider himself a superman. What values, in his opinion, could he create himself, being just a man? Perhaps these are the values ​​of overcoming, moving forward without stopping, about which he wrote so much? But how can you overcome something for the sake of something that does not yet fit into your consciousness? Here we find a clear parallel with Christianity. The Church teaches that a person must fight against base manifestations in himself for the sake of that higher that only God Himself can give him. How can a person know what to strive for if he is still enslaved to sin? This knowledge, little by little, gives him Grace, which both calls and directs and supports a person in this struggle. Grace is the manifestation of the power of God. So Nietzsche, only "inside out", believed in some great force, which informed him of the knowledge of the superman. He did not write his works himself, some irresistible passion drove his hand, which was also facilitated by the “terrifying, demonic hypersensitivity of his nerves” 12. Not only biographers of Nietzsche, but he himself in many places noted the affectivity, even the mediumship of his character. This aspect also includes the just statement of I. Garin: "The attractiveness of Nietzsche, which, by the way, grows with time, is due to his charismatic gift of" infection ", the transmission of a powerful energy impulse" 13. For a person, this is possible only if energy that feeds the impulse is something objective. So, whose medium was Nietzsche?

The key concept, the word in which this energy or force was encoded, is "Will". Nietzsche is called a voluntarist, that is, a representative of a philosophical trend that considers personal will, and not the laws of being, to be the main reason for the whole order of things. As a rule, voluntarism differed from Christianity in that it rejected God - “Will” turned out to be fragmented and therefore chaotic. Although some of the Christian thinkers of Europe were also voluntarists: for example, the English philosopher and historian Thomas Carlyle. In the atheistic voluntarism of the French existentialist philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre, man is endowed with absolute freedom, but he himself may not know about it; a person is alone with himself, and no one else will ask him. For Nietzsche, the concept of "Will" had a special prehistory associated with the names of the idols of his youth - Schopenhauer and Wagner.

By the time of his first acquaintance with the books of the German philosopher Schopenhauer (years of life 1788 - 1860) Nietzsche had already lost faith in God. At the age of fourteen, studying at the Pforta high school, he early became acquainted with the unbelief that reigned in the minds of the then recognized writers (although the school itself was religious). The great poets Schiller, Byron, Hölderlin and others became his idols - many of them are deeply depraved people who made pride and pride a principle of life. Having entered the university and making good progress in science, on the advice of his teacher, the famous philologist Professor Ritchl, he completely abandons his studies in theology in order to devote himself entirely to philology, Greek language and literature. From now on, he will reflect on Christianity, which has never given him rest, only from the outside, from the outside, from the position of an unbeliever and even an unfriendly mind.

In 1865, the reading of Schopenhauer made a real revolution in his soul and for the first time presented him with the need to reassess all the values ​​of life. In the book The World as Will and Representation, Schopenhauer wrote about the Will governing the world and the Representation that watches its grandiose and terrible performance. The will is insane, passionate, there is no contemplative principle in it, but only one active one. Constantly fighting with herself in the hypostases of her offspring, she represents eternal suffering. No one can escape death, because the Will must destroy in order to create. The idea itself is in bondage to the Will, but it can, through self-knowledge, reach the heights of contemplation. It makes the suffering of the individual meaningful, bringing it into dissonance with the empty content of the surrounding world. Nietzsche subtly felt the suffering and untruths with which the world is filled. It seemed to him that Schopenhauer is a prophet of liberation, who mercilessly points out to society its vices so that people can be saved. Although Schopenhauer often used Christian concepts, especially ascetic ones, in his philosophy "salvation" resembled what is called "enlightenment" in Hinduism and Buddhism: one needs to acquire apathy, equanimity, extinguish the will to live in oneself, that is log off from her. Then she will no longer have power over the person. One must fade away, die forever. Nietzsche understood it this way:

Wisdom

Truth - in the motionless one fading, in the rotten one!
Mystery is nirvana; the hopelessly powerless mind will receive bliss in her ...
Life is a holy calm, covered with sleep ...
Life is a grave, peacefully and quietly rotting from the light
Scull.

The next who had a huge influence on Nietzsche was the composer Richard Wagner (1813 - 1883). He met him at the time of his ardent passion for Schopenhauer, whom Wagner also appreciated. With his knowledge of music, talent and a critical mind, Nietzsche became a good conversationalist for the new idol of Germany, tired of fans. In Wagner's operas, noble and strong heroes always become victims, not knowing how to use the weapons of vile creatures - deception, etc. Wagner allegorically portrayed the departure of the mighty culture of old Europe in The Twilight of the Gods, where the omnipotent gods, as a result of struggle, treachery and the inevitable course of things, leave this world. Germany admired Wagner for the idea of ​​a German character, which he tried to convey with his music, breaking with the Italian opera canons. He built a real temple for himself in Bayreth - a theater specially designed for his productions, half-performances, half-mysteries (the building was subsequently burned down). Wagner, like Nietzsche, left Christianity in his youth. He experienced a chill to the faith after confirmation *, when, by his own admission, together with a friend "he ate some of the money intended to pay the pastor for confession on sweets" 14. In adulthood, he was friends with the founder of Russian anarchism, Mikhail Bakunin, and appreciated his advice; Bakunin once asked the composer, who intended to write the tragedy "Jesus of Nazareth," to describe Jesus as a weak character15. Wagner himself thought, like Nietzsche: "Christianity justifies the dishonorable, useless and miserable existence of man on earth with the miraculous love of God." The extinction of life, like that of Schopenhauer, was not an ideal for Wagner. He was more interested in heroism and its aesthetic features. He tried to ennoble the "will to live" by placing it in tragic circumstances. But he himself, according to the testimony of his contemporaries, loved success and personal fame most of all.

Gradually, dissatisfaction with Nietzsche with both Schopenhauer and Wagner grew. In both, he saw symbols of decline, an attempt to hide from reality, which in Wagner, moreover, puts on the guise of feigned heroism and hypocritical morality. Nietzsche, who himself wanted to be a herald of new truths, did not find in the person of his two idols either true leadership or sincere friendship. As soon as he began to criticize Wagner, the patronizing attitude of the master towards him began to become hostile and cold, and the composer's entourage made him laugh.

Nietzsche's passionate nature could not come to terms with hopelessness and extinction. After comprehension, he began to see in this philosophy a "lustful love of death," a malicious aestheticization of decay. To create a qualitatively different philosophy, the rehabilitation of Will was required, and therefore that cult of autocratic, not subject to anyone strength in the man for whom Nietzsche's philosophy is best known. He knew that this Will (which he called "The Will to Power") acts through him with special energy when he creates: composes music, poetry, philosophical aphorisms. He lived it, and without a religious life, he had the effect of getting used to frantic "creativity", the sole purpose of which is self-expression. True, in this self-expression he sometimes hardly recognized himself, and was frightened by the scale of his own activity. But more and more often force captured him entirely, leaving no time for calm reflection. He came to the conviction, which is very significant for a European person: "Culture is just a thin apple peel over a red-hot chaos" 17.

The basic concepts of Nietzsche's own philosophy were ressentiment, superman, eternal return. Let's consider them separately.

Ressentiment 18 is the latent hatred that the weak have towards the strong. Nietzsche himself considered himself a "strong" person, although in moments of despondency he often doubted this. The "weak" are unable to truly create, since their main goal is survival. Seeing that it was impossible to survive alone, they united and created a society, a state. The moral of these "monstrous" institutions gravitates on everyone, including the "strong" who do not need it. But to keep them in check, the "weak" invented shame, pity, compassion, etc. In fact, they are not capable of anything like that: their compassion, being external, is full of lust. But they suggest to the “strong” that they are wrong in everything. Thus, they protect their earthly life, although they preach about heavenly things all the time. According to Nietzsche, the essence of Christianity lies in the resentment. “This is hatred for mind, pride, courage, freedom ... to the joys of feelings, to joy in general ”19. The well-known conviction that the last Christian was Christ Himself, and He died on the cross, after which the apostles (especially Paul) radically perverted His teaching about non-resistance to evil, leads him to "anti-Christianity." Nietzsche considers the ideal of Christ to be weak and weak-willed, the ideal of His disciples - base and barbaric.

Was this attitude a consequence of a misunderstanding of Christianity? This is partly true. But it cannot be said that Nietzsche did not understand him completely and welcomed the primitive criticism of religion as sheer self-deception. In his youth, when one of his friends expressed an ironic opinion about the essence of prayer, Nietzsche gloomily interrupted him with the words: "A donkey's wit, worthy of Feuerbach!" 20. And in his famous work "On the Other Side of Good and Evil", he admits: "To love a person for the sake of God has been the noblest and most distant feeling that people have achieved so far ”21. But all such statements are drowned in his hatred of Christianity, which grew over time. Ressentiment has no content of its own. Being an envious feeling, he feeds only on other people's goods. The question of whether it is permissible to link ressentiment and Christianity is the question of the inner content of Christianity. Nietzsche knew his emotions about Christianity: they were different, and depending on his mood, he gave the floor to one or the other. But the positive content of Christianity was closed to him. He paid special attention to the criticism of the "world" in the Holy Scriptures, not understanding its meaning. Christianity teaches about two parts in man, the best and the worst. Love for the world and its vanity allows the worst part to develop to demonic proportions; on the contrary, renunciation of the world makes room for the better, heavenly side of the human soul. The philosopher did not recognize this side and did not notice, at least with his mind. But by doing so, he allowed the passions, which he took for the "Will to Power," take over and destroy himself. He strictly divided humanity into "best" and "worst", but he himself could not achieve complete confidence that he was one of the first. Rejecting the complexity, ambiguity and mobility of every living person, Nietzsche found himself unarmed in the face of the complexity of his own character.

Superman- the ultimate development of Nietzsche's idea of ​​a "strong" person. This is his dream, which could not come true. The opposite of the superman is the "last man", the embodiment of which the philosopher considered the society of his day. The main problem of the “last man” is his inability to despise himself22. Therefore, he cannot even surpass himself. This is the limit of the development of the "weak". Unable to create, he rejects all creativity as unnecessary, and lives only for pleasure. Not knowing how to truly hate anyone, he is ready to exterminate anyone who tries to disturb the peace and safety of his life. In the "last man" one can easily recognize that everyday ideal that is imposed on people of the XXI century. For Nietzsche, who believed in evolution, such a humanity turns out to be its dead-end branch. According to him, the superman will have to separate from the "last people", as a person from the impersonal mass. Maybe he will enter into a fight with them, or maybe he will command them. But what are the qualities of a superman? - This remains not entirely clear. What exactly will he create, what will he live for? And if only for his own sake, then what is his real difference from the "last man"? Most likely, the difference lies in the demonic nature of his nature. The "last man" is simply pathetic and worthless; the superman has the imprint of a superpowerful mind. He denies the qualities of Christ, but has the qualities of Dionysus - the pagan "suffering god" of wine, orgies and mysteries, the frantic twin of Apollo. Torn to pieces by the unraveling chaos, Dionysus confronts the Savior who voluntarily endures death and remains whole. Nietzsche saw Dionysus in himself. All the senses of the "superman" are heightened, he literally "rushes" around the universe, not stopping at anything. The demonic personality of Nietzsche himself was noted (not without admiration) by Stefan Zweig23.

In the idea of ​​dividing the human race into initially capable and incapable, we see one of the reasons for the popularity of Nietzsche's philosophy in our era. On the one hand, all mass media preach precisely the cult of the “last man”, who has nothing to create and only has to be happily used by everyone. On the other hand, in parallel, a cult of the “elite” is also being created, a special class of individuals who, for the good of the whole world, can wisely or “professionally” manage billions of ordinary mortals. And modern culture does not hesitate to emphasize the "demonism" of these people, it is even proud of them. The philosophy of Satanism is considered by many today to be the lot of intellectuals, and the very worship of Lucifer ("the light-bearer") is the religion of knowledge. But Nietzsche's example will always remain a warning against this. As a thinker, he could not blindly believe in the tenets of the religion he created. He doubted, feeling his weakness, susceptibility to painful conditions24. The support he found became the cause of his spiritual death. This is the "myth of the eternal return."

Eternal return- the world order, in accordance with which everything that happened in the world repeats itself without end and without beginning. This idea, similar to the view of Indian Brahmanism and other pagan philosophies, came to Nietzsche's head before he formalized the doctrine of the superman. But her influence was deeper and more lasting. The author himself considered its meaning to be cruel and ruthless: let everyone be ready to live the same life an infinite number of times... A difficult question arose before him: can a person change this life? And if it cannot, then the "return" is truly terrible. The fact of the matter is that can not... Nietzsche witnessed his own weakness; he felt a feeling of ressentiment growing irresistibly in himself in the presence of illness and impotence. [25] And if a person cannot change anything, he can only “forbid” himself those states into which his personality is ready to plunge. This means that victory over oneself lies in the willingness to accept life as it is. This was Schopenhauer's answer. Nietzsche proclaimed not a denial, but an affirmation of the Will. You need to completely surrender to it, and, standing in spite of everything that exists, take possession of everything (of course, in a subjective sense). This is how the concept of "Will to Power" arose, which the Nazis later used in an objective sense. And he gave himself up to that strength that in it acted on the plunder.

The idea of ​​"eternal return" has been called "myth" or even "symbol" for the reason that it should not be taken literally. We cannot say how much the author believed in the actual repetition of everything. True, this idea had a truly mystical effect on him: having struck him during a forest walk in the mountains, it shocked the thinker. He cried with sacred delight, thinking that he had found the "highest point of thinking" 26. The essence of "eternal return" was another concept - amor fati, love of fate. “Without a doubt, there is a distant, invisible, wonderful star that rules all our actions; let us rise to such a thought ”27. The readiness with which "the most freedom-loving philosopher" was ready to surrender to the power of some star is surprising. But what was important to him in return was superhuman strength, genius.

From the diary

The heart does not like freedom
Slavery from nature itself
The heart has been given as a reward.
Set your heart free
The spirit will curse its share
The link will break with life!

It was at this time that his passion for Lou Salome, which played a fatal role in his life, belongs to. Having fallen in love for the first time (this was in 1882, at the age of 38), Nietzsche characterized the object of his feelings as follows: “Lou is the daughter of a Russian general, and she is 20 years old; she is shrewd like an eagle, and brave like a lion, and for all that, however, she is too girl and child, who must not be destined to live long ”28. He was wrong. Lou lived for a long time (up to 76 years), and wrote about him in her memoirs. She became, to a certain extent, also the "muse" of the psychoanalytic movement; Z. Freud was friends with her, whose base and perverted philosophy would hardly have pleased Nietzsche himself. A woman of easy principles, Lou had an affair with Nietzsche and his friend, Paul Rae. At first, without noticing this, the philosopher chose her as an interlocutor for the presentation of his innermost ideas. But after a while the situation became clear; Nietzsche was insulted to the depths of his soul, especially since he was already thinking of starting a family. His sister Lisbeth, a man not very perceptive, but loving him, bluntly pointed out to her brother that Lou is the living embodiment of his own philosophy. (She was right: Nietzsche himself admits this in ESSE NOMO 29). As a result, he broke up with Lou Salome and Paul Re, and also had a falling out with his mother and sister. All this made a revolution in his impressionable soul. The idea of ​​'eternal return', of love for one's own destiny, was under threat: ' No matter what- he wrote these days to his best friend Peter Gast, - I would not like to relive these last few months ”30.

In an effort to overcome his humiliated state, he finishes his most famous book - "Thus Spoke Zarathustra." A truly demonic charge of genius is felt in her. At the same time, being as it were prophecy about the superman, the book was waiting for its continuation. Nietzsche wanted public outcry, controversy. Without waiting for them, he predicted that his works would influence the minds of people after his death. But Nietzsche could not stop there. Until the end of the 1880s. he writes a number of more and more challenging works. Its goal is "to rebel against all the sick in me, including here Wagner, including here Schopenhauer, including here all modern" humanity "31. However, it was a big mistake to associate all the sick in oneself only with strangers, only with former idols. Some kind of serious illness progressed in himself, demanding expression in evil pamphlets, in verse. Even Nietzsche's admirer I. Garin recognizes sadistic inclinations for him, although he entirely attributes them to a brain disease32.

Pay

Execution with your beauty, throwing yourself on a dirty bed ...
In the arms of crazy nights of execution by its beauty,
And let my goddess's body look like carrion! ..

From the diary

Don't judge me, my outbursts of anger:
I am a slave to passions and a formidable scourge of the mind ...
My soul has rotted, and instead of a body - bones ...
Do not judge! Freedom is a prison.

These and other poems show what was happening in his soul. The disease did develop on the bodily level as well. Karl Jaspers, a psychiatrist, writes about this: “Nietzsche's disease (progressive paralysis due to infection with syphilis) was one of those that weaken all inhibition processes. A sharp change in mood, ecstasy with unprecedented opportunities, leaps from one extreme to another ... all these are purely painful conditions ”33. But at the same time, the anguish of spiritual loneliness steadily grew. In the very years when he was writing his famous book The Will to Power, Nietzsche confessed in a letter to his sister: “Where are they, those friends with whom, as it once seemed to me, I was so closely connected? We live in different worlds, we speak different languages! I walk among them like an exile, like a stranger; not a single word, not a single glance reaches me ... A "deep man" needs to have a friend if he does not have God; and I have neither God nor friend "34. It is impossible to associate manifestations of the disease itself with the disease alone, which are different for different people. In addition, the infection with syphilis must have been caused by an incorrect lifestyle. At forty, he felt in his prime and wrote a famous poem

Noon of life.

Oh, noon of life, sultry summer garden,
Laden,
Intoxicated with alarming sensitive happiness!
I am waiting for friends. I waited day and night ...
Where are you friends? Come! The hour has come!

In 1889, Nietzsche's reason left and he suddenly plunged into an inadequate state, in which, with small gaps, he remained until his death in 1900. This was preceded by several months of struggle with mental illness. Friends and relatives were only gradually able to notice what was happening in the mind of the philosopher. Nietzsche was then living on vacation in Turin, Italy, which has always inspired his philosophical works. As in previous years, he actively corresponded - his letters came to Mrs. Meisenbuch, Cosime Wagner (the composer's wife), Peter Gast, Franz Overbeck and many of those who previously surrounded Nietzsche and now remained partial to his fate. “The most independent mind in all of Europe”, “the only German writer”, “the genius of truth” ... all these epithets with which he called himself in letters were now perceived as a manifestation of a creative crisis, incontinence of character. But they were followed by other, increasingly strange words. The letters were reduced to one line, which contained some incomprehensible confessions. He either called himself the names of the murderers about whom modern newspapers wrote, then suddenly he signed - "Dionysus" or "Crucified" ... Nietzsche's last feelings towards Christ remained a mystery. When Overbeck arrived in Turin, he found his friend in a deranged state, under the supervision of strangers. Nietzsche played the piano with his elbow, sang hymns in honor of Dionysus, jumped on one leg. The later years of insanity were calm, there is evidence of unexpected flashes of consciousness, although doctors argued that the brain was hopelessly affected. On August 25, 1900, Friedrich Nietzsche died in the city of Weimar.

"Zarathustra" by Friedrich Nietzsche in the light of the Beatitudes

The influence of Nietzsche on his contemporaries was not as great as on his descendants, including the present generation. According to K. Jaspers, “Nietzsche, and with him the modern man, no longer lives in connection with the One, which is God, but exists, as it were, in a state of free fall” 35. We examined the life of this German philosopher, the sad end of which is not in dissonance with the laws of its development. But the most successful work of Nietzsche, through which a powerful stream of his talent breaks through, not yet subject to the obvious morbid decay of the mind, is, of course, "Thus Spoke Zarathustra." Here, in a poetic form, the philosopher contrasted himself with all the values ​​of the Christian world, mixing them with objects that arouse contempt. He, as we could already see, tried in the person of Christianity to remove the obstacle on the way of the prophecy of the coming "superman". Therefore, our research will be incomplete if we do not consider this particular work of his in the light of the Beatitudes from the Savior's Sermon on the Mount. (Matt. 5: 3-12).

Blessed are the poor in spirit, for those are the Kingdom of Heaven.

Zarathustra almost nowhere directly contradicts the Gospel, and this is deeply no coincidence - Nietzsche seemed to be afraid to approach the Bible; he only indirectly refers to it. The ideal of evangelical poverty in the understanding of Nietzsche (like many unbelieving philosophers) is most closely associated with ignorance, to which he opposes active knowledge. “Since we know little, we heartily like the poor in spirit ... As if there is a special, secret access to knowledge, hidden for those who are learning something: this is how we believe in the people and their "wisdom" "36. Nietzsche saw in the poverty of the spirit a striving to cognize the truth without labor and suffering. This shows how deeply he was mistaken in relation to Christianity, not wishing to see it as a heroic deed. What he calls "voluntary poverty" 37 is essentially just an escape from reality. But the Lord called for something completely different. “For you say:“ I am rich, I have become rich and have no need for anything ”; but you do not know that you are miserable and wretched, and poor and blind and naked ”(Rev. 3:17). To be poor in spirit means first of all to realize this. “When a person looks inside his heart and judges his inner state, he will see spiritual poverty, which is worse than bodily poverty. He has nothing more in himself, except for poverty, curse, sin and darkness. He does not have true and living faith, true and heartfelt prayer, true and heartfelt thanksgiving, his own truth, love, purity, goodness, mercy, meekness, patience, peace, silence, peace and other kindness of the soul. ... But whoever has this treasure receives it from God, and does not have it from himself ”(St. Tikhon of Zadonsk) 37.

The blessedness of crying, for they will be comforted.

Nietzsche highly valued crying, and in his works, as well as in letters and diaries, we can often find evidence that his nervous nature was prone to shedding torrents of tears. "Peace - says Zarathustra - is sorrow to all depths" 38. However, it is no less important for him to overcome crying, that is, the already mentioned amor fati... Could a philosopher understand the words: “in the abyss of weeping there is consolation” (Ladder 7. 55)? His cry was of a different nature, and Nietzsche did not know the gospel cry “for God”. That is, I did not know crying as a request for healing, which at the same time serves as a means to healing. Many ascetics could fall into madness in solitude, like Nietzsche, if crying for their sins did not preserve their clarity of consciousness.

Blessed are the meek ones, for they will inherit the earth.

"Joyful" crying in Christian teaching is accompanied by meekness. Nietzsche did not advocate the cult of power, as it might seem. He was gentle with people and even spoke of himself as a meek person. But how can this be reconciled with the "will to power"? The fact is that the entire philosophy of Nietzsche refers to the inner world of a person, and his attention is directed only to self-awareness. He considered meekness as a moral effort to be hypocrisy, under which inner human vices are hidden. "I often laughed at the weak, who think they are kind, because they have relaxed paws." It must be admitted that a philosopher could really meet such examples in life. Kindness, in his opinion, should entirely be a natural impulse, again - an action. strength nature in man. Therefore, Nietzsche defends the idea of ​​revenge: it is better to take revenge in a natural impulse than to humiliate the offender with the guise of forgiveness. So, we see that the philosopher did not understand moral meekness as man's work on himself. It only says that at some stage in his life he himself gave up this work, surrendering to the will of the raging elements. But the Lord speaks of the meek as workers, tirelessly working not on their external image, but on the state of the heart. Therefore, as workers on the earth, they inherit it. “The Lord rests in the hearts of the meek, but a troubled soul is the seat of the devil” (Ladder 24. 7).

The blesses of hunger and thirst for righteousness, for they will be satisfied.

The desire for knowledge is always noted as an essential character trait of Nietzsche. But his knowledge did not have an ultimate goal, in the end it did not have a subject. In works devoted to Nietzsche, you can find the concept of "Don Juan of knowledge". What does it mean? Just as don Juan, according to legend, immediately cooled to the victims of his seduction, so the philosopher, allegedly, abandoned the truth immediately after he found it. In fact, this is not true: Nietzsche was very attached to his ideas and left them only when a powerful stream of consciousness carried him along. He was seduced, not seductive. But his desire was to become like his Zarathustra, for whom, in the end, "good and evil are only running shadows, wet sorrow and creeping clouds" 40. Christians crave truth, generally speaking, because they do not sympathize with falsehood. Bliss is promised because truth will prevail. The world, therefore, is a struggle between truth and falsehood, and the latter does not exist by itself: it is a distortion, a lie, a deception. For Nietzsche, it turns out, and the same good does not exist. He seeks the truth "beyond good and evil." But by the same token that all the same looking for, it shows the inherent gravitation towards truth in every person.

Blessedness of mercy, as there will be mercy.

Most of all, Nietzsche as a thinker receives reproaches for unmercifulness. In fact, here too, the ambiguity of his character was manifested. When he saw a dog with a wounded paw on the street, he could carefully bandage it; at the same time, when the newspapers wrote about the earthquake on the island of Java, which took the lives of several hundred thousand people at once, Nietzsche was in aesthetic delight from such "beauty". What does Zarathustra say about mercy? First of all, he resorts to his favorite method of exposing false, hypocritical virtue. “Your eyes are too cruel and you look lustfully at the suffering. Isn't it just your sensuality that has changed and is now called compassion! ”41. This exposure of lust hidden in pity occupies a lot of Nietzsche's mind. Perhaps someone hypocritically expressed sympathy for himself, as a sick person, and he acutely felt such moments. The fear of humiliation always lived in him: he was afraid of internal resentment. At the same time, of course, he did not have even the leisure to form an idea of ​​living, active mercy, which is not at all for show, but on the contrary, even hiding and hiding, does good to those who need it. So, under cover of night, St. Nicholas the Wonderworker. It means to place yourself and your property at the disposal of God, who gives every good to those who ask Him. Mercy does not think of itself as a virtue: it is, rather, obedience, with the help of which one can acquire some virtues of the soul. It helps to gain purity of the heart.

Blessed are those who are pure in heart, for they will see God.

Nietzsche speaks quite often of the body; in fact, being a monist *, he tries to shift the attention of German philosophy from the mind to the emotional sphere of the flesh. But at the same time - a strange thing - Nietzsche says very little about the heart. Moreover, "purity of heart" is generally ignored by him. "I teach you about a friend and his overflowing heart" 42 - such statements can still be found in Zarathustra. The heart must be overflowing. With what? Here the author describes himself, the high sensory tension of his character. The heart is understood, most likely, as a carnal muscle, but not as the focus of spiritual-bodily life. Meanwhile, it was not by chance that the Lord paid much attention to the heart. Speaking about the fact that a person is defiled not by what enters him, but by what comes from him, He meant the heart: “From the heart come forth evil thoughts, murder, adultery ... this is the essence that defiles a person” ( Matthew 15:19). And again: from the abundance of the heart, the mouth of man speaks (Luke 6:45). In a word, as St. Tikhon Zadonsky43, “what is not in the heart, that is not in the thing itself. Faith is not faith, love is not love, when the heart is not present, but there is hypocrisy. " The Gospel, therefore, contains the answer of Nietzsche, who was so afraid of all hypocrisy. Purity of heart excludes pretense, and only in it does a person regain his original ability to see God.

Blessed are the peacemakers, for they will be called the sons of God.

Nietzsche often spoke of "love for the distant," instead of love for the neighbor. And the word of God says: “I will fulfill the word: peace, peace to the far and the near, says the Lord, and I will heal him” (Isa. 57: 19). What does Nietzsche's “ethics of love for the distant” mean? This is a rather deep thought: in a person you need to love what he can become, and be exacting about what he is. Otherwise, loving him just like that, we will do him a disservice. Man in his development (in the future, superman) - this is, according to Nietzsche, "distant". As you can see, this has its own truth. Gospel love does not indulge and always requires change from a person. But it is no less true that a person must keep peace with other people, as a condition of inner peace with God. Often humanity, and especially the Church, is compared to a single body in which if different members are at enmity, none of them can be healthy. Naturally, the peacemakers are given such a high dignity: after all, by reconciling the hostile, they restore the harmony created by God Himself. But for Nietzsche, war (primarily in the allegorical, but also in the literal sense, too) is a necessary condition for development. Why? Because he does not believe in God and the intelligent structure of the universe. Zarathustra says this on behalf of Life: “whatever I create and however much I love what I have created, I must soon become an adversary to him and my love: this is what my will wants” 44. Here we recognize that blind Will that Schopenhauer taught: it begets and kills its creatures. Suffice it to say that this bleak idea destroyed Friedrich Nietzsche himself.

Be blessed to drive out the truth for the sake of those who are the Kingdom of Heaven.

Blessed naturally, when they reproach you, and depend, and rekut every evil verb against you lying, for my sake.

Christianity also knows about the presence of evil Will in the world, but sees its cause not in the objective order of being, but in its subjective distortions, the belittling of good. Therefore, if for the sake of the truth of God one needs to be expelled from somewhere, or even deprived of life, the Christian accepts this as bliss, because the world itself, afflicted by evil, thereby helps him to avoid his temptations. Nietzsche understood this intuitively. The majority, in his opinion, “hates the lonely” 45 who goes the other way. This is how the philosopher sees Christ, crucified by the majority because He denied his ostentatious virtue. But further Nietzsche asserts that if the Lord had still lived on earth, He would have refused to go to the Cross. It was a voluntary sacrifice, it was realized by giving up power. And the new, non-trivial virtue itself is Power46. “Don't you know who everyone needs the most? Who orders the great "47. The Christian meaning of the exile for the sake of truth was incomprehensible to the philosopher. He wanted to order, dictate values ​​to people, to be heard. But the Kingdom of Heaven is alien to vanity, and therefore does not come "in a perceptible way" (Luke 17:20). He must first step in the hearts of believers, and only after that triumph in the world. The prophet says about the Savior: “He will not cry out and lift up His voice, and will not let him be heard in the streets. He will not break a bruised reed, nor will he quench a smoking flax; will execute judgment in truth ”(Isa. 42: 2-3). If the Judgment of God is still coming, then blessed are those banished for righteousness.

Rejoice and be merry, for your wages are much in heaven.

At this point, it is fair to end our reading of Nietzsche. What could be more natural and at the same time more gratifying for a person than the belief that life is eternal, and our earthly life is only a test? Even the pagans retained this idea; but European philosophy lost it, succumbing to materialism. Nietzsche deliberately contrasts Eternity with his mechanical "eternal return." His hero runs the risk of being lost in timelessness: “I look forward and backward - and I do not see the end” 47. But even in spite of this, he utters a very true truth: "All joy wants the eternity of all things" 48. Only Nietzsche himself tried to find joy in doom, in “love of fate,” in the enjoyment of man by himself. But the result was, as it were, a building without a foundation and without a roof, unsuitable for life. “The joy of the created does not last long, like a dream, and like a dream, with the taking away of your beloved worldly things, it disappears: spiritual joy begins in time, but it will be completed in eternity, and abides forever, as God Himself, in Whom those who love Him rejoice forever abides ”(St. Tikhon Zadonsky) 49.

“Man loves to be God,” wrote the Serbian theologian Rev. Justin Popovich. “But none of the gods compromised themselves as terribly as the man-god. He could not comprehend neither death, nor suffering, nor life "50. This is the fate of the tragic European thinker F. Nietzsche. He lost his understanding of Christianity and the most important thing that it contains: that due to which it is neither a resentment, nor just a moral teaching, nor a philosophy. This is union with Christ and in Christ, in God. The promise of eternal life, containing inexhaustible benefits, because the Lord is alive and well. This is a Christian love that humbles every mind into obedience to itself, which “is longsuffering, merciful, does not envy, does not exalt, does not take pride, does not act outrageously, does not seek its own si, does not get irritated, does not think of evil, does not rejoice at unrighteousness, rejoices at the truth; He loves everything, eats faith in everything, everyone trusts, everything suffers. Luba will not be lost anymore: if the prophecies are abolished, if the heathens will be silent, if the mind will be destroyed ... ”(1 Cor. 13: 4-8).

1 Smolyaninov A.E. My Nietzsche. The Chronicle of the Interpreting Pilgrim. 2003 (htm).

2 Garin I... Nietzsche. M .: TERRA, 2000.

3 Daniel Halevy... The life of Friedrich Nietzsche. Riga, 1991.S. 14.

3 Faust and Zarathustra. Saint Petersburg: Azbuka, 2001.S. 6.

4 Cf. Towards a genealogy of morality.

5 Cf. Thus spoke Zarathustra.

6 Cf. Beyond Good and Evil.

7 Cf. Towards a genealogy of morality.

8 Cf. About the benefits and harms of history for life.

9 Cf. Daniel Halevy... The life of Friedrich Nietzsche. P. 203.

10 Nietzsche F... Compositions. T. 2.M .: Mysl, 1990.S. 752.

11 Faust and Zarathustra. P. 17.

12 Stefan Zweig... Friedrich Nietzsche. SPb .: "Azbuka-classic", 2001. S. 20.

13 Garin I... Nietzsche. P. 23.

* Confirmation is a rite of chrismation among Catholics and Lutherans, which they undergo in their youth.

14 Richard Wagner... Ring of the Nibelungen. M. - SPb., 2001.S. 713.

15 Ibid. P. 731.

16 Ibid. P. 675.

17 Nietzsche F... Compositions. T. 1.P. 767.

18 Ressentiment (French) - rancor, hostility.

19 Nietzsche F... Compositions. T. 2.P. 647.

20 Daniel Halevy... The life of Friedrich Nietzsche. P. 30.

21 Nietzsche F... Compositions. T. 2.P. 287.

22 Nietzsche F... Compositions. T. 2.P. 11.

23 Stefan Zweig... Friedrich Nietzsche. P. 95.

24 For many years of his life, Nietzsche could not work and sleep without narcotic drugs: he was so overcome by headaches and a general nervous breakdown. Cm. Daniel Halevy... The life of Friedrich Nietzsche. P. 192.

25 Nietzsche F... Compositions. T. 2.P. 704 - 705.

26 Daniel Halevy... The life of Friedrich Nietzsche. P. 172.

27 Ibid. P. 178.

28 Biography of Friedrich Nietzsche // World of Word (htm).

29 Nietzsche F... Compositions. T. 2.P. 744.

30 Daniel Halevy... The life of Friedrich Nietzsche. P. 191.

31 Nietzsche F... Compositions. T. 2.P. 526.

32 Garin I... Nietzsche. P. 569.

33 Karl Jaspers... Nietzsche and Christianity. M .: "MEDIUM", 1994. S. 97.

34 Daniel Halevy... The life of Friedrich Nietzsche. P. 235.

35 Karl Jaspers... Nietzsche and Christianity. P. 55.

36 Nietzsche F... Compositions. T. 2.P. 92.

37 Nietzsche F... Compositions. T. 2.S. 193-196.

37 Schiarchm. John (Maslov). Symphony. M .: 2003.S. 614.

38 Nietzsche F... Compositions. T. 2.P. 233.

39 Nietzsche F... Compositions. T. 2.P. 85.

40 Nietzsche F... Compositions. T. 2.P. 118.

41 Nietzsche F... Compositions. T. 2.P. 39.

* Monism is a broad philosophical trend, one of the postulates of which is that the soul and body are one and the same.

42 Nietzsche F... Compositions. T. 2.P. 44.

43 Symphony. P. 836.

44 Nietzsche F... Compositions. T. 2.P. 83.

45 Nietzsche F... Compositions. T. 2.P. 46.

46 Nietzsche F... Compositions. T. 2.P. 55.

47 Nietzsche F... Compositions. T. 2.P. 106.

47 Nietzsche F... Compositions. T. 2.P. 116.

48 Nietzsche F... Compositions. T. 2.P. 234.

49 Symphony. P. 785.

50 Venerable Justin (Popovich). Philosophical chasms. M .: 2004.S. 31.

Friedrich Nietzsche (1844-1900), German philosopher and poet. Born in the village of Röcken near Lützen (Saxony) on October 15, 1844. His father and both grandfathers were Lutheran priests. The boy was named by Friedrich Wilhelm after the reigning king of Prussia. After the death of his father in 1849, he was brought up in Naumburg on the Saale in the house where his younger sister, mother, grandmother and two unmarried aunts lived. Later, Nietzsche began attending the famous old boarding school of Pfort, and then studied at the universities of Bonn and Leipzig, where he delved into the Greek and Latin classics. In a shop of old books in Leipzig, he once accidentally discovered the book "The World as Will and Representation" by the German philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer, which made a strong impression on him and influenced his further work.

In 1869, Nietzsche, who had already published several scientific articles but did not yet have a doctorate, was invited to take the chair of classical philology at the University of Basel in Switzerland. Becoming a professor, Nietzsche received Swiss citizenship; however, during the Franco-Prussian War of 1870-1871, he enlisted in the Prussian army as a private orderly. Thoroughly undermining his health, he soon returned to Basel, where he resumed teaching. He became a close friend of the composer Wagner, who was then living in Triebschen.

Books (28)

Full composition of writings. In 13 volumes. Volume 1. Part 1

Birth of a tragedy. From the legacy of 1869-1873.

The first half of the first volume of the complete works of F. Nietzsche included the book "The Birth of Tragedy" (in the new edition of the translation by G. Rachinsky), as well as articles from the heritage of 1869-1873, thematically related mainly to antiquity, ancient Greek philosophy, mythology, music , literature and politics.

Full composition of writings. In 13 volumes. Volume 1. Part 2

Untimely reflections. From the heritage (works of 1872-1873).

The second flight of the first volume of the complete works of the German thinker F. Nietzsche included all four of his "Untimely Reflections", as well as lectures "On the Future of Our Educational Institutions" and other works from the legacy of 1872-1873, devoted to the problems of cognition and culture.

For many readers, Nietzsche can be a discovery not only of the very range of ideas disclosed in these texts, but also the extent to which they, for all their polemical acuteness, turn out to be relevant in today's world.

Three of the four "Untimely Reflections" are presented in new translations, some works are published in Russian for the first time, previously published translations have been verified with the original and substantially edited.

Full composition of writings. In 13 volumes. Volume 3

The third volume of the complete works of the German thinker F. Nietzsche includes his key works "Morning Dawn" and "Merry Science", as well as poems from the cycle "Messinian Idylls".

The previously published translations by V. Bakusev ("Morning Dawn") and K. Svasyan ("Merry Science") are given in a new edition.

Full composition of writings. In 13 volumes. Volume 9

Drafts and sketches 1880-1882

The ninth volume of the complete works of F. Nietzsche contains drafts and other records relating to the period 1880-1882.

First of all, these are fragments related to the work of the philosopher on "Morning Dawn" and "Merry Science". Among the drafts and notes of 1881 - extremely important for understanding the philosophy of Nietzsche, fragments devoted to the eternal return and the problems of cognition.

Part of the volume consists of notes made by Nietzsche while reading the works of Descartes and Spinoza (as presented by K. Fischer), B. Pascal, St. Mill, H. Spencer, R. W. Emerson, as well as works of art by French authors (especially Stendhal and Countess de Remusa).

Full composition of writings. In 13 volumes. Volume 11

Drafts and sketches 1884-1885

The eleventh volume of the complete works of F. Nietzsche contains drafts and other records relating to the period 1884-1885.

First of all, these are fragments associated with the work of Nietzsche on the fourth (final) book "Thus Spoke Zarathustra", and the new edition of "Human, Too Human", as well as on "Beyond Good and Evil" and a collection of poems, subsequently not published.

Another group is made up of notes made during the reading of works of art (A. de Custine, O. de Balzac, the Goncourt brothers, E. Renan, Stendhal, P. Merimee, Goethe and many others) and scientific works (G. Teichmüller, E. von Hartmann, P. Deissen, G. Oldenberg).

The entries dedicated to Wagner, as well as the central themes for Nietzsche's will to power and eternal return, deserve special mention.


The work of Friedrich Nietzsche, "Antichrist" was created in 1888, extremely fruitful for the German philosopher. In it, he appeals to those who are able to be "honest in intellectual things to the point of cruelty", for only such readers are able to endure the "seriousness and passion" with which Nietzsche smashes Christian values ​​and overthrows the very idea of ​​Christianity.

Genealogy of morality

The genealogy of morality was conceived by Friedrich Nietzsche as an appendix to his 1886 essay Beyond Good and Evil.

The external reason for writing The Genealogy of Morality was a wave of misinterpretation that fell on the author in connection with his previous work, in which Nietzsche tried to formulate the principles of a new moral behavior that remains moral, even without being associated with the supernatural.

In Nietzsche's Genealogy of Morality, with his characteristic paradoxicality of thought and depth psychological analysis examines the history of the origin of prejudices associated with the "God-given" of morality as such.

David Strauss, confessor and writer

This essay is the first in a series of cultural-critical essays that Nietzsche conceived immediately after the publication of The Birth of Tragedy, united under the general title Untimely Reflections.

Nietzsche's original design encompassed twenty themes, or, more precisely, twenty variations on a single cultural critical theme. Over time, this plan was either reduced (to thirteen), then increased (to twenty-four). Of the planned series, only four essays were succeeded: "David Strauss, Confessor and Writer", "On the Benefits and Harmfulness of History for Life", "Schopenhauer as an Educator", "Richard Wagner in Bayreuth."

Evil Wisdom. Aphorisms and sayings

The book includes aphorisms and sayings of Friedrich Nietzsche.

"... An exalted person, seeing the sublime, becomes free, confident, broad, calm, joyful, but absolutely beautiful shakes him with its appearance and knocks him off his feet: in front of him he denies himself ..." (Nietzsche)

Untimely reflections

Friedrich Nietzsche's grandiose plan - a series of twenty cultural-critical essays under the general title "Untimely Reflections" - was eventually implemented by him in the form of four essays: "David Strauss, Confessor and Writer", "On the Benefits and Harm of History for Life", "Richard Wagner in Bayreuth ”,“ Schopenhauer as an educator ”.

This is one of the first works of Nietzsche, which determined his further development in the spirit of irrationalism and reflected two passionate intellectual passions of the philosopher: the image of Wagner and the philosophy of Schopenhauer.

The book became a bold statement of the young Nietzsche for his own, original - sometimes scandalous - and the deepest understanding of various philosophical and aesthetic topics.

Nietzsche: Pro et contra

The purpose of the collection is to present the Russian image of Nietzsche as it was perceived and entered into the national cultural tradition at the dawn of the 20th century.

The book consists of essays by venerable Russian philosophers and writers at the turn of the 19th and 20th centuries, which have become classics of Russian Nietzsche studies. The anthology contains various, sometimes opposite, approaches, assessments and interpretations of the work of the German philosopher.

The birth of tragedy from the spirit of music

"... but those who would see in this coincidence the presence of a contradiction between patriotic excitement and aesthetic sybarism, between courageous earnestness and merry play, would have made a mistake; the problem we are dealing with here, which we have placed just at the focus of German hopes, as a point of apogee and turning point ... "


In this work, Nietzsche deploys an impressive picture of the continuing impact on thinking, in general on humanity, of the world of the Greek gods.

Two of them - Apollo and Dionysus, are for Nietzsche the personification of the irreconcilable opposition of two principles - Apollonian and Dionysian. The first of them is the world of dreams, beauty, perfection, but above all order. Dionysian is barbaric, returning back to nature, inherent in an individual who feels himself a work of art, accordingly violating any measure.

Collection of books

Ecce Homo how to become yourself
Antichrist. Curse to Christianity
Fun Science
The will to power. Experience of revaluation of all values
Evil wisdom (Aphorisms and sayings)
Selected Poems
Towards a genealogy of morality
Casus Wagner
Untimely Reflections - "David Strauss, Confessor and Writer"
Untimely reflections - "On the benefits and harms of history for life"
Untimely Reflections - "Richard Wagner in Bayreuth"
Untimely Reflections - "Schopenhauer as an educator"
About the future of our educational institutions
Songs of Zarathustra
Beyond Good and Evil
Birth of Tragedy, or Hellenism and Pessimism
Mixed opinions and sayings
The wanderer and his shadow
Twilight of idols, or how to philosophize with a hammer
Thus Spoke Zarathustra
Morning dawn, or the thought of moral prejudice
Human, too human

Mixed opinions and sayings

Every person striving for knowledge of the world sooner or later turns to the works of Friedrich Nietzsche.

This book contains the statements of the great German thinker. They make you look in a new way at what has long seemed known and beyond doubt.

Works in 2 volumes. Volume 1

Works in 2 volumes. Volume 2

The book of one of the largest representatives of German existentialism, Friedrich Nietzsche. Paradoxical logic of Nietzsche, characteristic set expressive means, requiring close study for themselves, lead the thoughtful reader to the borderline experience of human existence.

Friedrich Nietzsche's two-volume edition was originally planned for the Philosophical Heritage Library, but "philosophical" discussions around the word "heritage" pushed Nietzsche out of the Library - now he is taking his rightful place in it.